
Originally Posted by
Majesty
It's a little off. They didn't test if you were a witch by burning you, they burned you after it was a forgone conclusion.
This is a little more accurate
Officer: Have you been drinking tonight?
Driver: No..
Officer: Prove it by taking a breathalyzer.
Driver: NO!
Officer: Then I can't let you drive home.
Driver: NO!!!! I'll find an officer that doesn't care if im drunk or not! But I'm really not.
This last talk between the officer and the driver would have been more accurate if we have this exchange of conversation before that:
Officer's Dad: That driver is driving drunk. I can not prove it but he is driving drunk.
Officer: I better stop him.
The only reason that the officer stopped the driver is because of his dad's suspicion and the officer demands a breathalyzer test in the absence of any signs or symptoms of intoxication. Fortunately for all of us, this is not allowed in a democratic country.
Based on the above, the driver then has the right to refuse the breathalyzer test. But what did the driver say:
Driver: Okey, I'll do the test but I'll just blow a little.
And yet the driver is blamed for that.
Bookmarks