Are there true unbiased journalists or boxing experts out there?

[miron_lang]

I somehow enjoyed reading Bert Sugar and Dan Rafael's articles, blogs, interviews, etc. until recently. I got disappointed to see how both of them simply can't hide their "Go Pack...Mayweather is no good" attitude .

Are there true unbiased journalists or boxing commentators/analysts out there? In one way or the other I thought George Foreman was ok as far as I remember.

Those 2 are not bias. Ive read many negative articles from those 2 about Pac specially Rafael.

If they are "Go Mayweather.. Pack is no good" columnist you would still brand them as bias?

Yes, I would. That is why I somehow thought George Foreman was alright. I could hear him say good and bad things about one boxer and then go to the one he would face and express the same (positive and negative). At least the times I heard him comment.

I was surprised to read Bert Sugar's article and see how he mentioned that Floyd's request for blood test were wrong. I could understand if he said that and then continued saying something about raising suspicions on Pac's refusal to have his blood randomly tested. It would sound a bit more balanced I guess.

You have a point but these 2 guys have written negative things about pac on other matters. They're not bias imo.

The one i would say is really bias is that old guy Michael Marley Atlas's best friend.