F#%k the ring magazine

[JazMerkin]

Bagg is an opinion guy, I like reading his views even if I don't agree with them and the guy is pretty funny. Sure I disagree with him about Mayweather-Pacquiao but the Ring is paying him to present his opinion. Think of it no different as the op-ed page of the Washington Post where you will read some crazy biased one side shit but with boxing. He's old-school saying what he believes, he's not a bad journalist. He's actually one of the really good things going for the Ring imo.

Yes he is. Any 'journalist' who spends the whole time referring to himself in the 3rd person like he does should be shot. He's like a US hattonthehammer except without the insight. The Ring might as well pay Hammer to present his opinion because that's all he's got. Also Amat, anything can be funny when you're stoned even snuff videos or Jim Bagg.

[Jody Lane]

Bagg is an opinion guy, I like reading his views even if I don't agree with them and the guy is pretty funny. Sure I disagree with him about Mayweather-Pacquiao but the Ring is paying him to present his opinion. Think of it no different as the op-ed page of the Washington Post where you will read some crazy biased one side shit but with boxing. He's old-school saying what he believes, he's not a bad journalist. He's actually one of the really good things going for the Ring imo.

Yes he is. Any 'journalist' who spends the whole time referring to himself in the 3rd person like he does should be shot. He's like a US hattonthehammer except without the insight. The Ring might as well pay Hammer to present his opinion because that's all he's got. Also Amat, anything can be funny when you're stoned even snuff videos or Jim Bagg.

Bagg was annoying in one of Rings other magazines. How he graduated to the top level magazine makes me want to knock the baggoshit out of the bagglamebrained editor for making the baggridiculous decision to subject us to this baggilominoxious baggeretard.

[JazMerkin]

Bagg is an opinion guy, I like reading his views even if I don't agree with them and the guy is pretty funny. Sure I disagree with him about Mayweather-Pacquiao but the Ring is paying him to present his opinion. Think of it no different as the op-ed page of the Washington Post where you will read some crazy biased one side shit but with boxing. He's old-school saying what he believes, he's not a bad journalist. He's actually one of the really good things going for the Ring imo.

Yes he is. Any 'journalist' who spends the whole time referring to himself in the 3rd person like he does should be shot. He's like a US hattonthehammer except without the insight. The Ring might as well pay Hammer to present his opinion because that's all he's got. Also Amat, anything can be funny when you're stoned even snuff videos or Jim Bagg.

Bagg was annoying in one of Rings other magazines. How he graduated to the top level magazine makes me want to knock the baggoshit out of the bagglamebrained editor for making the baggridiculous decision to subject us to this baggilominoxious baggeretard.

The worst thing is that he finds way more opportunities to work his name into a paragraph then you could even feasibly manage there. I'm sure it would be 'Baggraduated to the Baggtop level Baggazine'. He must have something incriminating on the editor or Oscar because no sane editor would let him keep his job.

[amat]

It's funny though he's a character and I usually don't like to do my reading stoned. I like Bagg, you can't have a magazine of total centrists like an online news site would, that doesn't work in magazines. This is one of the basics of a magazine outline. Look at sports illustrated and especially ESPN the magazine and you will see the same opinion columns. I've been reading the Ring for a while now to the point where I think he is a nice balance for a magazine that really isn't much good overall.