Who are the biggest Floyd nuthuggers..ooops i mean "supporters" on the forum?

[JonesJrMayweather]

Those of you attacking Mar's post are clowns, honestly he made perfect sense. WTF type of thread is this? If you're going to make a thread trying to get names of other people and call them out then I'd just as soon see you banned as you're not contributing anything and only further polarizing the board. Honestly what are you 12?

didn't even have him (MAR) in mind until you brought him up but since you did..

"Having troubles with collazo" - Shane won 118-109 on two cards, 119-108 on the other and scored a knockdown

"Shane has very little chance" - the guy that beat oscar more convincingly, and twice. Floyd won a SD.

"Shane has very little chance" - judah wins 3 of the first 4 rounds, has an unofficial KD, but shane has very little chance

"Can;t beat cotto so therefore you can't beat floyd" - same logic should apply that would have one pick Margarito over Shane


I refer you to this: Perfection - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

[amat]

I was talking about his post in this thread, not the one you pulled from another thread and posted here. Honestly, quit while you're behind.

[JonesJrMayweather]

I was talking about his post in this thread, not the one you pulled from another thread and posted here. Honestly, quit while you're behind.

Who's really behind when clearly the posters that did post who they thought were the biggest nutthuggers named guys before they even showed up in the thread. Isn't that clear they were basing it off posts from other threads?

Its you that showed up and took only the one post made by your whitney houston poster "mar" within this thread then you decided to play kevin costner for him so you catch up. I mean really who would base what mar said within this thread as grounds for nutthugging....

[amat]

I was talking about his post in this thread, not the one you pulled from another thread and posted here. Honestly, quit while you're behind.

Who's really behind when clearly the posters that did post who they thought were the biggest nutthuggers named guys before they even showed up in the thread. Isn't that clear they were basing it off posts from other threads?

Its you that showed up and took only the one post made by your whitney houston poster "mar" within this thread then you decided to play kevin costner for him so you catch up. I mean really who would base what mar said within this thread as grounds for nutthugging....

I was referring to a specific post people were replying to, thus why I said there is nothing wrong with what he posted in this thread. I might not agree with what he says about Shane but wtf is this? You want the names of Mayweather "nuthuggers" and this is a useful post how? It's dumb. This is me looking back.

[JonesJrMayweather]

I was talking about his post in this thread, not the one you pulled from another thread and posted here. Honestly, quit while you're behind.

Who's really behind when clearly the posters that did post who they thought were the biggest nutthuggers named guys before they even showed up in the thread. Isn't that clear they were basing it off posts from other threads?

Its you that showed up and took only the one post made by your whitney houston poster "mar" within this thread then you decided to play kevin costner for him so you catch up. I mean really who would base what mar said within this thread as grounds for nutthugging....

I was referring to a specific post people were replying to, thus why I said there is nothing wrong with what he posted in this thread. I might not agree with what he says about Shane but wtf is this? You want the names of Mayweather "nuthuggers" and this is a useful post how? It's dumb. This is me looking back.

It was just a question of posters opinions..much like 90% of the threads are asking of opinions. I don;t think anyone criticized what he said in this thread. I don't want the names..I was asking about posters opinions and that was that.

Answer this, if the thread were titled "who are the biggest floyd supporter's on the forum" would you have the attitude about it?

[Kev]

Who's really behind when clearly the posters that did post who they thought were the biggest nutthuggers named guys before they even showed up in the thread. Isn't that clear they were basing it off posts from other threads?

Its you that showed up and took only the one post made by your whitney houston poster "mar" within this thread then you decided to play kevin costner for him so you catch up. I mean really who would base what mar said within this thread as grounds for nutthugging....

I was referring to a specific post people were replying to, thus why I said there is nothing wrong with what he posted in this thread. I might not agree with what he says about Shane but wtf is this? You want the names of Mayweather "nuthuggers" and this is a useful post how? It's dumb. This is me looking back.

It was just a question of posters opinions..much like 90% of the threads are asking of opinions. I don;t think anyone criticized what he said in this thread. I don't want the names..I was asking about posters opinions and that was that.

Answer this, if the thread were titled "who are the biggest floyd supporter's on the forum" would you have the attitude about it?

That's cos it's a totally different wording and meaning you pleb

It's like posting who is the most knowledgeble poster on the board versus who is the biggest know it all on the board, a totally different question, the first is about respect amongst peers and acknowledgment of a person's knowledge and standing and the second is a troll posting and invitation to a flame war.

[ryanman]

This thread is truly shit for a few reasons.
One of which is when I come on to 'lets get it on' I don't want to have to read the words 'Mayweather' or 'Pacquiao', or even 'Mosley' for that matter....actually not even the word 'boxing'.

[JonesJrMayweather]

I was referring to a specific post people were replying to, thus why I said there is nothing wrong with what he posted in this thread. I might not agree with what he says about Shane but wtf is this? You want the names of Mayweather "nuthuggers" and this is a useful post how? It's dumb. This is me looking back.

It was just a question of posters opinions..much like 90% of the threads are asking of opinions. I don;t think anyone criticized what he said in this thread. I don't want the names..I was asking about posters opinions and that was that.

Answer this, if the thread were titled "who are the biggest floyd supporter's on the forum" would you have the attitude about it?

That's cos it's a totally different wording and meaning you pleb

It's like posting who is the most knowledgeble poster on the board versus who is the biggest know it all on the board, a totally different question, the first is about respect amongst peers and acknowledgment of a person's knowledge and standing and the second is a troll posting and invitation to a flame war.

If that's not the biggest crock of shit. I understand majority of this forum discussions are cool..but at least once in mostly every thread after a big event, several posters are called out for being biased, fanboys, nutthuggers, and sometimes far worse. I'm not talking about noobs that join after their guy wins and they join up to fanatically argue everything and everyone on the board. I'm talking about members with thousands of posts. So because the thread just jumps right to the obvious instead of waiting for a big fight to happen its trolling? Get the fuck out of here with that, don't know if its saddo-pms or you guys having been inside of some sort of other "hidden forum" where you webcam group jerk each other..


That very example you listed, would just have people come in and say you're not that knowledgeable, a know it all maybe. And so forth...

[match]

Those of you attacking Mar's post are clowns, honestly he made perfect sense. WTF type of thread is this? If you're going to make a thread trying to get names of other people and call them out then I'd just as soon see you banned as you're not contributing anything and only further polarizing the board. Honestly what are you 12?

didn't even have him (MAR) in mind until you brought him up but since you did..

"Having troubles with collazo" - Shane won 118-109 on two cards, 119-108 on the other and scored a knockdown

"Shane has very little chance" - the guy that beat oscar more convincingly, and twice. Floyd won a SD.

"Shane has very little chance" - judah wins 3 of the first 4 rounds, has an unofficial KD, but shane has very little chance

"Can;t beat cotto so therefore you can't beat floyd" - same logic should apply that would have one pick Margarito over Shane


I refer you to this: Perfection - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

1st and last points are accurate but the 2nd and 3rd are way off. Shane's first win over Oscar was the same split decision win Floyd got, and Shane was losing and had to rally to win (he arguably lost the rematch but that's beside the point). And the 3 rounds Judah won on most people's scorecards were the ONLY rounds he won in the fight. Losing 9 rounds to 3 is not competitive at all.