Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
Array
I like Berto and agree that he can beat any other guy out there in the division ecept for Mosley, Pacquiao and Mayweather... Pic one and they'd ruin him... All by stoppage.
The Urango fight had me thinking that he may have been evolving as a fighter... Fighting with a game plan, sticking to it and winning. The Urango fight was boring as hell but he stayed away and boxed. It seems to me that he reverts and "fights down" to his opposition. It's a figure of speech... I'm not saying he's not fighting formidable guys cuz he absolutly is. I just think that his learning curve has grinded to a halt and unlike a guy like Pacquiao who has seemingly shattered the learning curve, he's stuck.
Hidden Content
"There's nothing special about him." -Sergiy Dzinziruk
Array
Im glad someone else thinks Kevin A-Hole is a complete tosser![]()
Hidden Content
Original & Best: The Sugar Man
"You knocked him down...now how bout you try knockin me down ?"
I still say stylistically he gives MOsley and Mayweather honest challenges.
Mayweather because he is also a good jabber, and as he showed against Forbes he can fight against this type of fighter without becoming wild.
Against Mosley because MOsley doesn't have a great jab and he leaps in with most of his hooks from far away, and it only works against guys slower than him. I think Berto is better on the outside as long as he wouldn't load up. I don't think he is better than MOsley, but the styles match up well for him to face an orthodox fighter. It also helps that Mosley is a trully fluid fighter, and neither of them seems to know how to shorten up punches to garner better accuracy.
I think Pacquiao have difficulties with Berto's speed for awhile, but in the end I think Pacquiao is just too much offensively for all the mistakes Berto makes defensively.
Array
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks