UK Prime Ministerial candidate debate

[ryanman]

I was watching Question Time after the debates, and the presenter asked Labour's Ed Milliband:

"Wouldn't a hung parliament be the worst possible result?"

He replied: "It's not the worst POSSIBLE result, no...."

Voting for Lib Dem isn't aiming for real change though is it.

I suppose it depends on how big the change you're looking for is. There's the far right and the far left who would be willing to destroy the current system for you, but I don't see either side's arguments getting enough oxygen to build any kind of base. The Greens are proposing their environmental revolution and promising 500,000 new "green" jobs. I think the real choice has to be which part of the middle ground do we take.

correct me if im wrong here as im a complete political novice

The likelihood is a hung parliament with a tory majority. Does that then mean Mr Cameron goes to buckingham palace and asks the queens permission to form a government consisting pretty much of all colours of the rainbow which in turn would cause chaos in trying to get new measures passed what with both sides simply choosing to cancel eachother out?

If there is a hung parliament the party that received most votes does not have to be included in a coalition. So say if the Tories got most seats but not an overall majority it could be the Lib Dems and Labour that form a coalition. In regards to coalitions not getting anything done that is usually the fear. But they have worked before and do work very well in other countries. It wouldn't be so bad I don't think as it would force a period of consenus and real problem solving rather than the usual adverserial populist crap.