kessler-froch what REALLY happened (a non biased account of what took place)

[HattonTheHammer]

I thought Kessler won 116-115. It was a very close fight between two fighters lacking in skill and quality. I don't know why both men were so tired, it wasn't exactly what I would call a 4real hard fight. I think what lost Froch the fight, is that he doesn't look good on the eye. He looks sloppy, his jab isn't a jab, he just paws it out there. Don't get me wrong Kessler was poor too and needs lessens in how to cut the ring, but thought he just nicked it. Frochs lucky ran out. He could and should have lost to Dirrell. He got a gift in that fight and Jermain Taylor beat Jermain Taylor, not Froch.

you didnt happen to be watching the fight with teddy atlas did you

ICB once again crys like a bitch allowing his anti froch stance to get in the way of what actually happened. Froch could of won every single around and you would of still called it for kessler. Unlike yourself i dont allow my biased opinions to get in the way of scoring contests and call it as i see it

I watched it again last night and i still had for it for Mikkel Kessler 115-113, and pretty much most people had it for Mikkel Kessler aswell. And i think that scoring is pretty much the most unbiased.

You don't let your biased views get in the way ? are you serious ? your scoring is horrendous, and all you do is constantly be totally biased towards British fighters.

Lastly why would i cry ? im not a fan of either fighter. But i don't hate either fighter either, your the one that had to change your name, and your boy lost legitmately so what have i got to cry about ?

See how you contradict yourself there?

And please stop with all this british fighters thing its really getting annoying. I`ll be just about the biggest malignaggi fans 3 weeks from now and was also in complete agreement with fantana over the disgraceful manner in which david haye barged his way to the world title against ruiz

[ICB]

you didnt happen to be watching the fight with teddy atlas did you

ICB once again crys like a bitch allowing his anti froch stance to get in the way of what actually happened. Froch could of won every single around and you would of still called it for kessler. Unlike yourself i dont allow my biased opinions to get in the way of scoring contests and call it as i see it

I watched it again last night and i still had for it for Mikkel Kessler 115-113, and pretty much most people had it for Mikkel Kessler aswell. And i think that scoring is pretty much the most unbiased.

You don't let your biased views get in the way ? are you serious ? your scoring is horrendous, and all you do is constantly be totally biased towards British fighters.

Lastly why would i cry ? im not a fan of either fighter. But i don't hate either fighter either, your the one that had to change your name, and your boy lost legitmately so what have i got to cry about ?

See how you contradict yourself there?

And please stop with all this british fighters thing its really getting annoying. I`ll be just about the biggest malignaggi fans 3 weeks from now and was also in complete agreement with fantana over the disgraceful manner in which david haye barged his way to the world title against ruiz

The truth hurts doesn't it ? you are totally biased that is a fact, your scoring is a joke. And yes your boy lost legitmately, which is why the judges had it a UD for Mikkel Kessler, and because a majority of boxing fans British and non British had Mikkel Kessler a clear winner.

Your the one whining and crying because your boy lost, just be thankful he didn't lost earlier. Because he deserved to lose vs Andre Dirrell, atleast his first loss was in a FOTY candidate vs Mikkel Kessler.

[HattonTheHammer]

I watched it again last night and i still had for it for Mikkel Kessler 115-113, and pretty much most people had it for Mikkel Kessler aswell. And i think that scoring is pretty much the most unbiased.

You don't let your biased views get in the way ? are you serious ? your scoring is horrendous, and all you do is constantly be totally biased towards British fighters.

Lastly why would i cry ? im not a fan of either fighter. But i don't hate either fighter either, your the one that had to change your name, and your boy lost legitmately so what have i got to cry about ?

See how you contradict yourself there?

And please stop with all this british fighters thing its really getting annoying. I`ll be just about the biggest malignaggi fans 3 weeks from now and was also in complete agreement with fantana over the disgraceful manner in which david haye barged his way to the world title against ruiz

The truth hurts doesn't it ? you are totally biased that is a fact, your scoring is a joke. And yes your boy lost legitmately, which is why the judges had it a UD for Mikkel Kessler, and because a majority of boxing fans British and non British had Mikkel Kessler a clear winner.

Your the one whining and crying because your boy lost, just be thankful he didn't lost earlier. Because he deserved to lose vs Andre Dirrell, atleast his first loss was in a FOTY candidate vs Mikkel Kessler.

Jesus christ youve got that down as your fight of the year?

[ICB]

See how you contradict yourself there?

And please stop with all this british fighters thing its really getting annoying. I`ll be just about the biggest malignaggi fans 3 weeks from now and was also in complete agreement with fantana over the disgraceful manner in which david haye barged his way to the world title against ruiz

The truth hurts doesn't it ? you are totally biased that is a fact, your scoring is a joke. And yes your boy lost legitmately, which is why the judges had it a UD for Mikkel Kessler, and because a majority of boxing fans British and non British had Mikkel Kessler a clear winner.

Your the one whining and crying because your boy lost, just be thankful he didn't lost earlier. Because he deserved to lose vs Andre Dirrell, atleast his first loss was in a FOTY candidate vs Mikkel Kessler.

Jesus christ youve got that down as your fight of the year?

Read what i said idiot, i said it was a FOTY "candidate". Meaning at the moment its one of the best fights of the year, i didn't say it was the best fight of the year, otherwise i would of said it was the "FOTY".

[HattonTheHammer]

The truth hurts doesn't it ? you are totally biased that is a fact, your scoring is a joke. And yes your boy lost legitmately, which is why the judges had it a UD for Mikkel Kessler, and because a majority of boxing fans British and non British had Mikkel Kessler a clear winner.

Your the one whining and crying because your boy lost, just be thankful he didn't lost earlier. Because he deserved to lose vs Andre Dirrell, atleast his first loss was in a FOTY candidate vs Mikkel Kessler.

Jesus christ youve got that down as your fight of the year?

Read what i said idiot, i said it was a FOTY "candidate". Meaning at the moment its one of the best fights of the year, i didn't say it was the best fight of the year, otherwise i would of said it was the "FOTY".

If you found that to be fight of the year worthy material im in no doubt you`d be able to sit through a junior witter boxset

[ICB]

Jesus christ youve got that down as your fight of the year?

Read what i said idiot, i said it was a FOTY "candidate". Meaning at the moment its one of the best fights of the year, i didn't say it was the best fight of the year, otherwise i would of said it was the "FOTY".

If you found that to be fight of the year worthy material im in no doubt you`d be able to sit through a junior witter boxset

Well so far its the 2nd best fight of this year maybe the 3rd, only Miguel Roman vs Antonio Escalante. Is the only real FOTY at the moment.

You must be very hard to please. Because i thought it was the best fight by far, in the Super six tournament. The action was always free flowing, no clinching or ETC. And the later rounds were dramatic and exciting, with both men cut and hurt.

I mean it had pretty much everything you could of hoped for, and your mocking me but except for Miguel Roman vs Antonio Escalante, has there really been a better fight this year ?

Of course i expect there will be quite a few more, better fights than Carl Froch vs Mikkel Kessler. But at the moment there isn't.

[HattonTheHammer]

Read what i said idiot, i said it was a FOTY "candidate". Meaning at the moment its one of the best fights of the year, i didn't say it was the best fight of the year, otherwise i would of said it was the "FOTY".

If you found that to be fight of the year worthy material im in no doubt you`d be able to sit through a junior witter boxset

Well so far its the 2nd best fight of this year maybe the 3rd, only Miguel Roman vs Antonio Escalante. Is the only real FOTY at the moment.

You must be very hard to please. Because i thought it was the best fight by far, in the Super six tournament. The action was always free flowing, no clinching or ETC. And the later rounds were dramatic and exciting, with both men cut and hurt.

I mean it had pretty much everything you could of hoped for, and your mocking me but except for Miguel Roman vs Antonio Escalante, has there really been a better fighter this year ?

Of course i expect there will be quite a few more, better fights than Carl Froch vs Mikkel Kessler. But at the moment there isn't.

tons and tons, your average friday fight night would probably produce a fight of far better quality than 2 world class supermiddleweights feeling eachother out for 12rounds..

small-webb
smith-dodson
renda-samuels
marsh-booth
rhodes-moore

off the top of my head