Re: kessler-froch what REALLY happened (a non biased account of what took place)

Originally Posted by
ICB

Originally Posted by
HattonTheHomo

Originally Posted by
ICB
I watched it again last night and i still had for it for Mikkel Kessler 115-113, and pretty much most people had it for Mikkel Kessler aswell. And i think that scoring is pretty much the most unbiased.
You don't let your biased views get in the way ? are you serious ? your scoring is horrendous, and all you do is constantly be totally biased towards British fighters.
Lastly why would i cry ? im not a fan of either fighter. But i don't hate either fighter either, your the one that had to change your name, and your boy lost legitmately so what have i got to cry about ?
See how you contradict yourself there?
And please stop with all this british fighters thing its really getting annoying. I`ll be just about the biggest malignaggi fans 3 weeks from now and was also in complete agreement with fantana over the disgraceful manner in which david haye barged his way to the world title against ruiz
The truth hurts doesn't it ? you are totally biased that is a fact, your scoring is a joke. And yes your boy lost legitmately, which is why the judges had it a UD for Mikkel Kessler, and because a majority of boxing fans British and non British had Mikkel Kessler a clear winner.
Your the one whining and crying because your boy lost, just be thankful he didn't lost earlier. Because he deserved to lose vs Andre Dirrell,
atleast his first loss was in a FOTY candidate vs Mikkel Kessler.
Jesus christ youve got that down as your fight of the year?



one dangerous horrible bloke
Bookmarks