OR whAT ABOUT PACMAN VS HAMED how would that have been?

[denilson200]

don't know..but i think prince is slick enough to duck and counter, but manny is quick enough to land sometimes too...don't know if PAC could take prince's power though, but naz could take his because prince did have a chin...

If Pac fought Naz. Naz would have 2 chances SLIM and NONE ......and SLIM just left town. The fact that Naz retired so early and only had one defeat on his record will make ring historians think he is better than what he was. If anything his power covered up a lot of cracks. I see, Naz as a tennis player with a HUGE serve, such he'll win a lot of matches and tournaments but he'll NEVER be great tennis player, because he doesn't have the all round game.

[Majesty]

Pacquiao right now would win because he has made leaps and bounds as a fighter. But if we are talking about Pacquiao from featherweight that was mostly jab jab left hand jab jab left hand and was countered at will by someone like a Juan Manuel Marquez. Pacquiao's style at featherweight is all wrong for a counter puncher, especially a counter puncher with a lot of one shot power. Looking at ICB's avatar of whitaker, the second knockdown where the guy came wailing in only to be countered by whitaker's left hand laying him out, is pretty much the way I see the fight going. Pacquiao would be over aggressive and left hand happy and would be countered and probably knocked out. Slick boxing coutner puncher with one punch KO power is a bad style matchup for Pacquiao at featherweight.