So you're Man City, money is no object - who do you buy?

[Master]

Wake up and smell the coffee, they never qualified for the CL and will be hard pressed to get anyone truly world class.

[smashup]

Fully expect Jose M to arrive

I can see Gerrard and Torres bot going too.

Torres says he wants to go back to Spain sooner or later but £300k a week should iron that out

[Master]

They are not going to waste a year of their career in the Europa League after coming back from the world cup no matter what the money.

[boxingbantz]

No offence but this is one of the stupidest threads I have read on here.

Why are you saying 'So you're Man city, money is no object..."? Why not say - what would be your World XI? I can only assume that you are a Manchester City fan and as daft as the next one. If you truly believe that 'money is no object', you live on cloud cuckoo land, the same as all of the other City fans.

Man City are a football club and they have a business plan so money is an object to them. They can't just sign 'anyone' as you seem to imply. A few of the 'big names' will be leaving in the summer anyway - Tevez will definitely be off as he is a mercenary and will end up at Real Madrid - and no top player will want to play in the Europa league ffs - Kaka proved this and then Man City had the cheeky to say that he 'bottled it' - what a bunch of imbeciles. The fact that some of their fans actually believe that players like Torres and Terry will want to join them just goes to show why they are a a laughing stock and have been for many years now.

Just because they have come into a bit of money, the club and the fans seem to think that they are one of the biggest clubs in the world at the moment and it is laughable to be honest. Somewhat arrogant too and they just go to show, money can't buy you success. £176m and they didn't even quality for the Champions League.

34 years.

Oh, for the record, I apologise if you are not a Man City fan but the tone of the thread seems to suggest so. If not, as I said, you should've just asked for a World XI.

[boxingbantz]

For the record:

Casillas

Alves Vidic Puyol Evra

Ronaldo Essien Xavi Iniesta

Messi Rooney

[Master]

No offence but this is one of the stupidest threads I have read on here.

Why are you saying 'So you're Man city, money is no object..."? Why not say - what would be your World XI? I can only assume that you are a Manchester City fan and as daft as the next one. If you truly believe that 'money is no object', you live on cloud cuckoo land, the same as all of the other City fans.

Man City are a football club and they have a business plan so money is an object to them. They can't just sign 'anyone' as you seem to imply. A few of the 'big names' will be leaving in the summer anyway - Tevez will definitely be off as he is a mercenary and will end up at Real Madrid - and no top player will want to play in the Europa league ffs - Kaka proved this and then Man City had the cheeky to say that he 'bottled it' - what a bunch of imbeciles. The fact that some of their fans actually believe that players like Torres and Terry will want to join them just goes to show why they are a a laughing stock and have been for many years now.

Just because they have come into a bit of money, the club and the fans seem to think that they are one of the biggest clubs in the world at the moment and it is laughable to be honest. Somewhat arrogant too and they just go to show, money can't buy you success. £176m and they didn't even quality for the Champions League.

34 years.

Oh, for the record, I apologise if you are not a Man City fan but the tone of the thread seems to suggest so. If not, as I said, you should've just asked for a World XI.

It was a joke thread and you really have the Kop up your ass.

[Nameless]

Well... when they have a fortune estimated 40 times higher than Roman Abramovitch... I wouldn't say that money is a concern for them. Plan or not, they can derogate if they want and spend 200-300 millions day and night and the Sheiks wouldn't even notice. Thus said, I am certain they will make it very profitable in the middle time, these guys obviously have tons of experience in business and management but the club could lose money for the next 20 years and it would be still without debts if they want.

[boxingbantz]

Well... when they have a fortune estimated 40 times higher than Roman Abramovitch... I wouldn't say that money is a concern for them. Plan or not, they can derogate if they want and spend 200-300 millions day and night and the Sheiks wouldn't even notice. Thus said, I am certain they will make it very profitable in the middle time, these guys obviously have tons of experience in business and management but the club could lose money for the next 20 years and it would be still without debts if they want.

I think they would notice to be honest and I would love to know where you get your information that they are 40 times richer than Abramovich. the Al-Nahyan family’s total holdings are said to be worth at least $26 billion (about £14.4 billion) and Abramovich is said to be worth £10bn. They are obviously a fair bit richer than him but they WOULD notice if they spent £200m every few months.

Not having a dig but Garry Cook (as much of a joke as that clown is) even said last year that they can't be spending as much as they did last summer every year and that they will have to 'budget' - albeit, they may have a larger budget than most.

[BIG H]

No offence but this is one of the stupidest threads I have read on here.

Why are you saying 'So you're Man city, money is no object..."? Why not say - what would be your World XI? I can only assume that you are a Manchester City fan and as daft as the next one. If you truly believe that 'money is no object', you live on cloud cuckoo land, the same as all of the other City fans.

Man City are a football club and they have a business plan so money is an object to them. They can't just sign 'anyone' as you seem to imply. A few of the 'big names' will be leaving in the summer anyway - Tevez will definitely be off as he is a mercenary and will end up at Real Madrid - and no top player will want to play in the Europa league ffs - Kaka proved this and then Man City had the cheeky to say that he 'bottled it' - what a bunch of imbeciles. The fact that some of their fans actually believe that players like Torres and Terry will want to join them just goes to show why they are a a laughing stock and have been for many years now.

Just because they have come into a bit of money, the club and the fans seem to think that they are one of the biggest clubs in the world at the moment and it is laughable to be honest. Somewhat arrogant too and they just go to show, money can't buy you success. £176m and they didn't even quality for the Champions League.

34 years.

Oh, for the record, I apologise if you are not a Man City fan but the tone of the thread seems to suggest so. If not, as I said, you should've just asked for a World XI.

You're some sort of Kunt aint ya!

It's just a thread to see who you would have in a team if money was no object! I am not a City Fan!!

[johnmaff36]

Harry Redknapp for starters

[boxingbantz]

You're some sort of Kunt aint ya!

It's just a thread to see who you would have in a team if money was no object! I am not a City Fan!!

Well in that case there is no excuse for using the words Manchester City and some of the world's biggest names in the same thread.

[HattonTheHammer]

manager: Harry Redknapp/Jose Mourinho

Goalie: keep him

Konchesky - 3m
Dunne(get him back) - 2.5m
Upson - 4m
Richards:keep him

Petrov:Keep him
Parker - 10m
Gerrard - 15m
Benayoun - 7m

Tevez: keep him
Adebayor: keep him

[ono]

No offence but this is one of the stupidest threads I have read on here.

Why are you saying 'So you're Man city, money is no object..."? Why not say - what would be your World XI? I can only assume that you are a Manchester City fan and as daft as the next one. If you truly believe that 'money is no object', you live on cloud cuckoo land, the same as all of the other City fans.

Man City are a football club and they have a business plan so money is an object to them. They can't just sign 'anyone' as you seem to imply. A few of the 'big names' will be leaving in the summer anyway - Tevez will definitely be off as he is a mercenary and will end up at Real Madrid - and no top player will want to play in the Europa league ffs - Kaka proved this and then Man City had the cheeky to say that he 'bottled it' - what a bunch of imbeciles. The fact that some of their fans actually believe that players like Torres and Terry will want to join them just goes to show why they are a a laughing stock and have been for many years now.

Just because they have come into a bit of money, the club and the fans seem to think that they are one of the biggest clubs in the world at the moment and it is laughable to be honest. Somewhat arrogant too and they just go to show, money can't buy you success. £176m and they didn't even quality for the Champions League.

34 years.

Oh, for the record, I apologise if you are not a Man City fan but the tone of the thread seems to suggest so. If not, as I said, you should've just asked for a World XI.

Ok i'll bite.

First of all, you don't know what you're talking about regarding what happened with Kaka. You absolutely don't. It went a little something like this....

The reason the Kaka deal fell apart was mostly down to Milan and his Dad (also his agent)being very unprofessional. The offer was accepted so we entered negotiations with his Dad. Negotiations we're going very well and at this point we had his Dad's word that he'd sign. This lead to Mark Bowen (He was the then assistant manager) releasing a comment to the BBC stating that a deal was very close.

However, whilst this was going, the Milan Ultras began to stage protests in the streets. Silvio Berlusconi and Adriano Galliani were both threatened by the Ultras. This all started to put pressure on the deal.

Negotiations broke for the weekend because Milan had a game. On the night of the game, one of the directors at Milan had started to tell some Milan shareholders that the sale had been agreed. This was reported as fact on Sky Sports News at the time.

Monday morning came around and the negotiations started again. The professionalism and hospitality shown by Milan was an actual disgrace and it meant that nothing really got done. The protests in the streets also didn't help. It got to the point on that night where Kaka's Dad wanted it to go through and all he wanted was a contract to sign as we had agreed to his salary in principal.

Unfortunately it's not as easy as offering a contract and getting the player to sign it. It's not Football Manager. Kaka was tied in with a lot of sponsorships with Milan and Adidas and he was also entitled to an awful lot of image rights for various other Milan related things. We'd spent a lot of time going through all of this and getting all of the red tape done by Tuesday, so we could actually make it official. Italian Media we're actually reporting that the deal had gone through in principal and all that was missing was the final signature, which was merely a formality.

Because of the severity of the protests, Kaka's Dad and Milan wanted to rush through the deal. We couldn't. This lead to them demanding we present them with a contract to sign. This was impossible so we walked away. Garry Cook received a phone call whilst he was at the airport from Kaka's Dad, pretty much asking him to offer the contract. Again, it couldn't physically be done until all the sponsorships had been done.

That was where Cook's 'bottled it' comment stems from. Now i don't expect you to believe that, as i'm guessing you're a United fan, it's much easier for you to believe The Sun or some other know nothing journalist who reveled in the complete fallacy that Kaka did indeed say no.

I suggest you read the comments made by Garry Cook and read all of the contradictions made by Berlusconi, Galliani and Kaka shortly after the deal fell through.

If that's not enough, ask yourself why it took so long for the deal to collapse if it hadn't reached such an advanced stage. Ask yourself why, if he wasn't interested, would we even have negotiated in the first place. I mean Robinho and Elano are very good friends of his. It wouldn't have been hard for us to find out if he was interested in listening to what we had to say

I'll ignore the insults and generalisations you've aimed at City fans. It's about as relevant as me saying all United fans are glory supportes living in London/Thailand/anywhere but Manchester.

Moving on to Tevez and you're laughable comment about how he'll be definitely off because he's a mercenary. First of all, you've defeated yourself with that comment, because surely if he was a mercenary he's going to stick around given the money he's on? Secondly, i imagine Berbatov and Rooney all play for free. Yes?

Ignoring your Torres dig and getting back on topic, we're short of a left back, two central midfielders and probably two wingers. We have a deal in place with Hamburg for Jerome Boateng who is a right back.

After that, i know we've been in contact with benfica (as reported by ESPN) about David Luiz who is a left back and Angel Di Maria who is a left winger. Di Maria will definitely leave Benfica this summer, but there are other teams to consider for him. I've no idea who our midfield targets are, but i do know we're trying very hard to sign Fernando Torres. Not qualifying for the Champions League hasn't altered anything in that respect because Liverpool haven't either. It's a question of where the best future prospects and chances of success lie. Given we've finished above them and have money to spend, in contrast to their current situation, i'd say that he has some thinking to do. Personally i wouldn't bother, given his injury record and given that we're OK upfront.

Anyway i'm glad that you find it amusing that we're trying to sign this calibre of player. It will make it all the more sweeter when it happens


Smashup - Mancini is definitely staying.

[boxingbantz]

Ok i'll bite.

First of all, you don't know what you're talking about regarding what happened with Kaka. You absolutely don't. It went a little something like this....

The reason the Kaka deal fell apart was mostly down to Milan and his Dad (also his agent)being very unprofessional. The offer was accepted so we entered negotiations with his Dad. Negotiations we're going very well and at this point we had his Dad's word that he'd sign. This lead to Mark Bowen (He was the then assistant manager) releasing a comment to the BBC stating that a deal was very close.

However, whilst this was going, the Milan Ultras began to stage protests in the streets. Silvio Berlusconi and Adriano Galliani were both threatened by the Ultras. This all started to put pressure on the deal.

Negotiations broke for the weekend because Milan had a game. On the night of the game, one of the directors at Milan had started to tell some Milan shareholders that the sale had been agreed. This was reported as fact on Sky Sports News at the time.

Monday morning came around and the negotiations started again. The professionalism and hospitality shown by Milan was an actual disgrace and it meant that nothing really got done. The protests in the streets also didn't help. It got to the point on that night where Kaka's Dad wanted it to go through and all he wanted was a contract to sign as we had agreed to his salary in principal.

Unfortunately it's not as easy as offering a contract and getting the player to sign it. It's not Football Manager. Kaka was tied in with a lot of sponsorships with Milan and Adidas and he was also entitled to an awful lot of image rights for various other Milan related things. We'd spent a lot of time going through all of this and getting all of the red tape done by Tuesday, so we could actually make it official. Italian Media we're actually reporting that the deal had gone through in principal and all that was missing was the final signature, which was merely a formality.

Because of the severity of the protests, Kaka's Dad and Milan wanted to rush through the deal. We couldn't. This lead to them demanding we present them with a contract to sign. This was impossible so we walked away. Garry Cook received a phone call whilst he was at the airport from Kaka's Dad, pretty much asking him to offer the contract. Again, it couldn't physically be done until all the sponsorships had been done.

That was where Cook's 'bottled it' comment stems from. Now i don't expect you to believe that, as i'm guessing you're a United fan, it's much easier for you to believe The Sun or some other know nothing journalist who reveled in the complete fallacy that Kaka did indeed say no.

I suggest you read the comments made by Garry Cook and read all of the contradictions made by Berlusconi, Galliani and Kaka shortly after the deal fell through.

If that's not enough, ask yourself why it took so long for the deal to collapse if it hadn't reached such an advanced stage. Ask yourself why, if he wasn't interested, would we even have negotiated in the first place. I mean Robinho and Elano are very good friends of his. It wouldn't have been hard for us to find out if he was interested in listening to what we had to say

I'll ignore the insults and generalisations you've aimed at City fans. It's about as relevant as me saying all United fans are glory supportes living in London/Thailand/anywhere but Manchester.

Moving on to Tevez and you're laughable comment about how he'll be definitely off because he's a mercenary. First of all, you've defeated yourself with that comment, because surely if he was a mercenary he's going to stick around given the money he's on? Secondly, i imagine Berbatov and Rooney all play for free. Yes?

Ignoring your Torres dig and getting back on topic, we're short of a left back, two central midfielders and probably two wingers. We have a deal in place with Hamburg for Jerome Boateng who is a right back.

After that, i know we've been in contact with benfica (as reported by ESPN) about David Luiz who is a left back and Angel Di Maria who is a left winger. Di Maria will definitely leave Benfica this summer, but there are other teams to consider for him. I've no idea who our midfield targets are, but i do know we're trying very hard to sign Fernando Torres. Not qualifying for the Champions League hasn't altered anything in that respect because Liverpool haven't either. It's a question of where the best future prospects and chances of success lie. Given we've finished above them and have money to spend, in contrast to their current situation, i'd say that he has some thinking to do. Personally i wouldn't bother, given his injury record and given that we're OK upfront.

Anyway i'm glad that you find it amusing that we're trying to sign this calibre of player. It will make it all the more sweeter when it happens


Smashup - Mancini is definitely staying.

You bitters live in another world. I am sure you witnessed all of these events unfold in person? Jesus wept.

[ono]

Lol, we'll see.

£650m










TICK TOCK