One of my mates knows Danny Dyer, and says he's a really top bloke if that means anything.

Anyway why is Danny getting into trouble over this if it got published?

Even if he did say that it's the EDITORS' decision to publish it!

Dyer just sounds like he was talking tongue in cheek, the kind of silly stuff I would likely say.

Like me he probably automatically assumes that most people will think he's messing about rather than seriously advocating harming your ex, it's just that a lot of people in this world are evidently a bit thick and take things literally.

But again, it was the editor's decison to publish and responsibility for it getting into the public domain. not Danny's.