Sensational Davey Moore is a guy I remember who was exciting and almost no defense back in the early/mid 1980's.
Terry Norris certainly could box, but often he chose to ignore defense and attack.
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sensational Davey Moore is a guy I remember who was exciting and almost no defense back in the early/mid 1980's.
Terry Norris certainly could box, but often he chose to ignore defense and attack.
Array
Tyson attacked most of the time but had a good defence.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Array
My mind went to Tyson too. He was hand molded to utilize his own shape and size for it.
Alot of it was in the mind, in his and his opponents.
Naz was all offensive and hard to hit; but he accomplished it for other reasons blending flexibility and power from his legs and hips bringing him back into the line of fire after being completely off balance when ever he was attacked (which really annoyed most strict traditional boxing minds).
Some middle of the road fighters who have been guided gently through a career
get all offensive but end up paying for it when someone has a bigger heart and keeps their cool, balance and power.
I like watching the wheels come off of buses like that.
Tyson, Foreman, and Joe Frazier...those guys used their power more specifically the threat of their power as a defense which is why in some of their fights you see guys afraid to throw punches at them. Wladimir Klitschko's jab and hooking off the jab is used to protect range and keep his opponent at distance therefore limiting any solid retaliation.
Array
I always think of high-volume pressure fighters when I hear the term offense as defense, but I think Lyle makes a good point about guys like Foreman who just terrified people into inaction.
Array
Array
Array
Array
Nigel Benn was all out vicious attack particularly in the early days.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Array
I've been trying to figure out who to pick in the Cotto-Foreman fight for the Prediction Contest, so I've been doing some reading about the fight (yes, I am that much of a loser) and I came across an article that said Miguel Cotto's offense was his defense and I figured I'd see if you guys agreed with that. I'm not sure I do, Cotto's not the type of relentless pressure fighter or huge puncher that I associate with the offense as defense crowd. I think Cotto's simply a very good offensive fighter with somewhat mediocre defense, if that makes sense - I'm not sure if it does.
Array
Array
Well given the title of the thread I figured he fit the mold....his offense and the threat of his punching power keeps the guys he fights from attacking him. What's wrong with mentioning that? The constant use of his jab has really limited Wlad's need for defense (eventhough his defense has improved)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks