Quote Originally Posted by JonnyFolds View Post
I just want to know.. What did you guys have as your scorecard after 4 rounds?

Personally, I saw Cintron outboxing Williams handily. I do not like the way he fights. I think he fights like a pansy, and he has very little skill. But stylistically, he was a nightmare for Williams. Williams, a man who doesn't use his reach very well (see Tommy Hearns) was getting beat to the punch consistently.

In round4 when they started, MAYBE I could give that 1:00 or so round to Williams. He came out on a mission to put the pressure on Cintron. Granted, I think Williams was going overwhelm Cintron in rounds to come.

Does anybody realize that the scoring was:
40-36 Williams
40-36 Cintron
39-37 Williams

I am not sure what the judges were looking at. Thoughts?
Kermit Cintron was winning and he was robbed end of, yes i know about his fight vs Sergio Martinez, but still two wrongs don't make a right, and i don't see where all this talk of Paul Williams was coming on comes from either.

I saw Kermit Cintron landing good shots in 4th round, and Paul Williams struggled to get his ryhthm going. Paul Williams has only ever met one puncher, and he was pretty mediocre.

Kermit Cintron despite his lack of courage at times, is a good fighter with good athletic ability, and who knows how Paul Williams would of stood up to that power.