Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: all the weights all the belts

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    975
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: all the weights all the belts

    You guys are also forgetting the Ring Magazine lineal champion belts.

    BTW the IBO is fast starting to be another major title belt. I expect in 10 years time it will be added to the WBA, WBC, IBF, WBO as legitimate belts.

    Isn't that cool, we get to have 5 champions per division in a few more years!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Kent, England
    Posts
    989
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    816
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: all the weights all the belts

    I hate the fact there are so many belts but money rules. A lot of casual fans will never know who is the best fighter in the weight class but for those of us who know a bit more it's equally frustrating seeing the best fighters avoid each other while each claiming to be the best.

    I don't understand why people get annoyed with there being so many weight divisions the way i see it if people are fighting people in their weight class it's fair regardless of how many divisions there are. I think for people who were boxing fans before there were so many divisions have a problem as people don't usually like change but for me there has always been a lot of divisions so it's all i know.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,571
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    924
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    I think the Ring champion is also fairly rated now. That is as good as a 5th belt already.

    The Ring magazine has the right idea and they don't charge any fees to win their belts, they at least try and be impartial.

    Unifying titles is as hard as ever now, often you'll need to vacate one organisation to win in another.

    Also, the only people that care about belts are the lesser fighters. The biggest names aren't even bothered with them now, they know the fight makes money with or without a world title.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    962
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: all the weights all the belts

    i dont neccessarily think fighters are avoiding each other that much nowadays, i read some stat somewhere, and i cant remember exactly what it was but it was something like, in the last 5 years there have been more genuine world champions fighting each other than in the previous 25 years

    look at the super 6 too, i think times are changing

    do you think having more belts helps spread the wealth?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    4,485
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1759
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: all the weights all the belts

    all these belts are my biggest hate of the sport without a doubt, one title per weight class the end, how amazing would that be, that way all the fighters fight each other or dont get a shot at the title, how amazing would that be

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Fighting City of Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1581
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: all the weights all the belts

    The belts would not be so bad if they would leave them unified when fighters unify them.

    So they would always stay unified, and they would only become un-unified if a fighter vacates. That would start the new process of consolidating power.

    All that this would need would be for the four alphabet gangs to have unified mandatories. instead of klitschko having to fight his IBF and WBO mandatories, the the IBF and WBO mandatories would fight each other for the Unified mandatory slot.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Another reason belts don't mean anything
    By MMASUX in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-02-2010, 03:10 AM
  2. Title Belts
    By Chino in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-29-2007, 06:36 AM
  3. Belts
    By boozeboxer in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-01-2007, 06:29 PM
  4. Can someone explain the ABC belts to me
    By MustangAce in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 08-11-2007, 01:11 AM
  5. Why not unify the belts?
    By chrisbird13 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-11-2006, 05:51 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing