Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789
Results 121 to 128 of 128

Thread: Naz-vs-Marquez? The greatest duck in history? Fact.

Share/Bookmark
  1. #121
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    908
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Naz-vs-Marquez? The greatest duck in history? Fact.

    khan is nothing but a damned fraud! the little bastard takes fights with old, washed up fighters. notice how he avoids fighters like maidana, alexander, bradley, etc...as soon as he's put in with a fighter who is in his prime, he'll get his ass beat like breidis prescott destroyed the fraud.

  2. #122
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Naz-vs-Marquez? The greatest duck in history? Fact.

    Con is the only fighter I know who got build up after accomplishing nothing. Have groupies fall for his charade . Only to get brutally exposed. Get build back up after again accomplishing nothing. And have the same idiotic groupies again fall for the same charade.

  3. #123
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    4,528
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1388
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Naz-vs-Marquez? The greatest duck in history? Fact.

    Thats something we can all agree on. Khan is a joke!

  4. #124
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    8,641
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1396
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Naz-vs-Marquez? The greatest duck in history? Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by milmascaras1 View Post
    khan is nothing but a damned fraud! the little bastard takes fights with old, washed up fighters. notice how he avoids fighters like maidana, alexander, bradley, etc...as soon as he's put in with a fighter who is in his prime, he'll get his ass beat like breidis prescott destroyed the fraud.

    Kotelnik?? The guy who just got robbed against hype job Alexander and Malinaggi who just beat Juan Diaz? Them two fighters are as good a wins as any other fighter at 140. Malinaggi would make Maidana look like a fucking novice.

  5. #125
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Naz-vs-Marquez? The greatest duck in history? Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by skel1983 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by milmascaras1 View Post
    khan is nothing but a damned fraud! the little bastard takes fights with old, washed up fighters. notice how he avoids fighters like maidana, alexander, bradley, etc...as soon as he's put in with a fighter who is in his prime, he'll get his ass beat like breidis prescott destroyed the fraud.

    Kotelnik?? The guy who just got robbed against hype job Alexander and Malinaggi who just beat Juan Diaz? Them two fighters are as good a wins as any other fighter at 140. Malinaggi would make Maidana look like a fucking novice.
    Malinaggi and Kotelnik are fine fighters. Con beating them counts. But not that much. Con beating them shows he has great speed and great boxing skills. Who the fuck cares? Everybody pretty much knows that already. What they don't know is if he can take a punch. And they will continue to not know cuz so far he's been scared to death of getting into the ring with another puncher. I have no doubt Con still sees Prescott in his nightmares. Those 54 seconds still haunt him

  6. #126
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    8,641
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1396
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Naz-vs-Marquez? The greatest duck in history? Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by skel1983 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by milmascaras1 View Post
    khan is nothing but a damned fraud! the little bastard takes fights with old, washed up fighters. notice how he avoids fighters like maidana, alexander, bradley, etc...as soon as he's put in with a fighter who is in his prime, he'll get his ass beat like breidis prescott destroyed the fraud.

    Kotelnik?? The guy who just got robbed against hype job Alexander and Malinaggi who just beat Juan Diaz? Them two fighters are as good a wins as any other fighter at 140. Malinaggi would make Maidana look like a fucking novice.
    Malinaggi and Kotelnik are fine fighters. Con beating them counts. But not that much. Con beating them shows he has great speed and great boxing skills. Who the fuck cares? Everybody pretty much knows that already. What they don't know is if he can take a punch. And they will continue to not know cuz so far he's been scared to death of getting into the ring with another puncher. I have no doubt Con still sees Prescott in his nightmares. Those 54 seconds still haunt him
    I don't disagree with this but his fight with Madiana is a step in the right direction.

  7. #127
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Naz-vs-Marquez? The greatest duck in history? Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by skel1983 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by skel1983 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by milmascaras1 View Post
    khan is nothing but a damned fraud! the little bastard takes fights with old, washed up fighters. notice how he avoids fighters like maidana, alexander, bradley, etc...as soon as he's put in with a fighter who is in his prime, he'll get his ass beat like breidis prescott destroyed the fraud.

    Kotelnik?? The guy who just got robbed against hype job Alexander and Malinaggi who just beat Juan Diaz? Them two fighters are as good a wins as any other fighter at 140. Malinaggi would make Maidana look like a fucking novice.
    Malinaggi and Kotelnik are fine fighters. Con beating them counts. But not that much. Con beating them shows he has great speed and great boxing skills. Who the fuck cares? Everybody pretty much knows that already. What they don't know is if he can take a punch. And they will continue to not know cuz so far he's been scared to death of getting into the ring with another puncher. I have no doubt Con still sees Prescott in his nightmares. Those 54 seconds still haunt him
    I don't disagree with this but his fight with Madiana is a step in the right direction.
    It sure is. If it happens

  8. #128
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Up in the attic
    Posts
    26,468
    Mentioned
    448 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4171
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Naz-vs-Marquez? The greatest duck in history? Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by hitmandonny View Post
    In the first Marquez and Pacquaio fight, Marquez rose from the canvas three times in the first round and put on one of the finest comeback displays I've ever seen.

    Anyone who displays that bravery can't be accused of cowardice.
    Thats a good point.

    He came over as a fighter who originally wanted to be recognized by his own countrymen to be the best, his soul aim was towards Barrera and Morrales for a long time.

    When you have a plan like that you dont want your road disrupted by someone like Naz, call it a duck if you must but every fighter and trainer picks their way through to where they wish to end up by weighing up risk /rewards. In hindsight I dont think he would of swapped a win or loss to Naz for a win or a loss to his fellow countrymen.
    Hidden Content " border="0" />

    I can explain it.
    But I cant understand it for you.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. ** The Greatest 1 round fight in boxing history **
    By CutMeMick in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 82
    Last Post: 01-09-2010, 12:49 AM
  2. The greatest boxing trilogy in history is?
    By rjj tszyu in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 08-02-2008, 11:57 AM
  3. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-28-2008, 11:56 AM
  4. greatest boxing rounds in history top ten
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-22-2006, 04:45 PM
  5. The 10 greatest trilogies in boxing history
    By Gandalf in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 06-07-2006, 04:01 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing