Abraham v Froch now 27/11/2010

[erics44]

When Froch trades with Abraham it'll be goodnight vienna.

Dirrell beat Abraham with his footwork. Abraham himself admitted he was too slow in the fight - he's been working on moving his feet faster for the Froch fight (not that he needs to be quick against Froch).

you talk like froch is easy to beat

one thing that is very common on this forum is peoples dislike for boxers clouding their judgement

ignore fenster

other than ice he is the sites froch hater

Ice once said he could go the distance with manny pac

Uhh no i said i could possibly last 9 minutes, maybe i couldn't maybe i could. Who cares whats that got to do with anything ?

And why are you licking up HTH's ass ? are you the same person ? because you both act very alike.

Infact i know the MOD's may edit this comment which is fine, but i think your both a bunch of wind up merchants, if its not HTH on two accounts.

You both are totally clueless, and say any old rubbish. To get a rise out of people, honestly its like you two are from totally different planets.

Audley Harrison can beat the Klitschko brothers, Carl Froch whooped Dirrell/Kessler. And Carl Froch was ahead going into the last round vs Jermain Taylor ?

Are you kidding me ? do you actually believe this crap you spout out ?

Im not a hater of Carl Froch at all, i think he's exciting fighter and is willing to fight anybody. But just because he's British i don't totally erase his flaws from my mind, and claim any old bullshit like HTH does.

The fact is many people believe he lost to Andre Dirrell, Carl Froch didn't "whoop" or "whip" anyone.

A whooping is James Toney vs Iran Barkley/Joe Calzaghe vs Jeff Lacy.

Carl Froch vs Andre Dirrell was a messy/untidy fight, with not alot of action. But Andre Dirrell was able to make it his kind of fight, and Carl Froch struggled to land anything meaningful and was outboxed.

Against Mikkel Kessler he was outworked/outhustled, if the fight was in any doubt. Mikkel Kessler won the last round to seal the deal, he won the fight. With a good steady body/head attack.

Against Jermain Taylor he was behind going into the 12th round by atleast 3 rounds, anybody who had Carl Froch ahead. Is a clueless moron, it was a good win for Carl Froch. But to say he didn't need a KO in the last round is utter rubbish.

dude really, i think it is you who are clueless

admittedly I got carried away with the harrison klit thread mind

but heres one thing I feel very very strongly about and it has nothing to do with nationality, If dirrell had of been given the decision against froch it would have been an absolute tragedy and a very bad thing for boxing as a whole. I honestly believe the fight should have been stopped after a few rounds or dirrell at least get a very harsh warning. thousands of fans had paid a lot of money to be at the fight and to watch it on pay per view and they didnt pay that money to watch someone run a hold and generally spoil

[erics44]

OK - Saying he "Whopped" Direll. NOBODY could objectively say either of those guys "Whopped" the other it was a dull nothing fight, there was no "Whopping"

So now you show me the posts where I talk about Froch gettled "Rocked by this guy and wobbled by this guy" Because that wasn't me that wrote that or any of the other posts. Mixing me up with Facster me thinks

Whopping isnt a real word, what does it mean?

you made a strong statement saying i cant be objective and thats the best you can do, i dont know if you have read the whole of this thread but earlier i said my money is on AA against froch, is that not objective?

[BIG H]

OK - Saying he "Whopped" Direll. NOBODY could objectively say either of those guys "Whopped" the other it was a dull nothing fight, there was no "Whopping"

So now you show me the posts where I talk about Froch gettled "Rocked by this guy and wobbled by this guy" Because that wasn't me that wrote that or any of the other posts. Mixing me up with Facster me thinks

Whopping isnt a real word, what does it mean?

you made a strong statement saying i cant be objective and thats the best you can do, i dont know if you have read the whole of this thread but earlier i said my money is on AA against froch, is that not objective?

You made statements about my dislike of a fighter etc and were quoting somebody else mate - go figure

[ICB]

When Froch trades with Abraham it'll be goodnight vienna.

Dirrell beat Abraham with his footwork. Abraham himself admitted he was too slow in the fight - he's been working on moving his feet faster for the Froch fight (not that he needs to be quick against Froch).

you talk like froch is easy to beat

one thing that is very common on this forum is peoples dislike for boxers clouding their judgement

ignore fenster

other than ice he is the sites froch hater

Ice once said he could go the distance with manny pac

Uhh no i said i could possibly last 9 minutes, maybe i couldn't maybe i could. Who cares whats that got to do with anything ?

And why are you licking up HTH's ass ? are you the same person ? because you both act very alike.

Infact i know the MOD's may edit this comment which is fine, but i think your both a bunch of wind up merchants, if its not HTH on two accounts.

You both are totally clueless, and say any old rubbish. To get a rise out of people, honestly its like you two are from totally different planets.

Audley Harrison can beat the Klitschko brothers, Carl Froch whooped Dirrell/Kessler. And Carl Froch was ahead going into the last round vs Jermain Taylor ?

Are you kidding me ? do you actually believe this crap you spout out ?

Im not a hater of Carl Froch at all, i think he's exciting fighter and is willing to fight anybody. But just because he's British i don't totally erase his flaws from my mind, and claim any old bullshit like HTH does.

The fact is many people believe he lost to Andre Dirrell, Carl Froch didn't "whoop" or "whip" anyone.

A whooping is James Toney vs Iran Barkley/Joe Calzaghe vs Jeff Lacy.

Carl Froch vs Andre Dirrell was a messy/untidy fight, with not alot of action. But Andre Dirrell was able to make it his kind of fight, and Carl Froch struggled to land anything meaningful and was outboxed.

Against Mikkel Kessler he was outworked/outhustled, if the fight was in any doubt. Mikkel Kessler won the last round to seal the deal, he won the fight. With a good steady body/head attack.

Against Jermain Taylor he was behind going into the 12th round by atleast 3 rounds, anybody who had Carl Froch ahead. Is a clueless moron, it was a good win for Carl Froch. But to say he didn't need a KO in the last round is utter rubbish.

dude really, i think it is you who are clueless

admittedly I got carried away with the harrison klit thread mind

but heres one thing I feel very very strongly about and it has nothing to do with nationality, If dirrell had of been given the decision against froch it would have been an absolute tragedy and a very bad thing for boxing as a whole. I honestly believe the fight should have been stopped after a few rounds or dirrell at least get a very harsh warning. thousands of fans had paid a lot of money to be at the fight and to watch it on pay per view and they didnt pay that money to watch someone run a hold and generally spoil

Whether or not Andre Dirrell spoiled or was boring means jack shit, if he derserved to win he deserved to win end of. I mean what did Carl Froch do really himself ? yes he come forward but it has to be effective aggression. Carl Froch was just walking slowly forward throwing the odd punch and being rough on the inside.

But he wasn't landing effective punches, and he looked totally frustrated. Infact Andre Dirrell was the one that was able to rock Carl Froch in the 11th round. He was also able to keep the distance and outbox Carl Froch.

Yes it wasn't pretty, i never said it was. But just because Andre Dirrell was boring, doesn't mean he didn't deserve to win. I think most fans feel Andre Dirrell won by a few rounds.

And just for the record i don't like Andre Dirrell, and i'd rather Carl Froch win over Andre Dirrell any day of the week. But the way i scored it RBR, and the way most fans scored it. They had Andre Dirrell as the winner.

[erics44]

OK - Saying he "Whopped" Direll. NOBODY could objectively say either of those guys "Whopped" the other it was a dull nothing fight, there was no "Whopping"

So now you show me the posts where I talk about Froch gettled "Rocked by this guy and wobbled by this guy" Because that wasn't me that wrote that or any of the other posts. Mixing me up with Facster me thinks

Whopping isnt a real word, what does it mean?

you made a strong statement saying i cant be objective and thats the best you can do, i dont know if you have read the whole of this thread but earlier i said my money is on AA against froch, is that not objective?

You made statements about my dislike of a fighter etc and were quoting somebody else mate - go figure

"go figure"? are you sure your not american?

if thats what is getting your goat dude, i am sorry i mixed you up with some other dude

you have to admit tho its an easy mistake to make when a vast majority of board members have a severe dislike for certain boxers

[erics44]

When Froch trades with Abraham it'll be goodnight vienna.

Dirrell beat Abraham with his footwork. Abraham himself admitted he was too slow in the fight - he's been working on moving his feet faster for the Froch fight (not that he needs to be quick against Froch).

you talk like froch is easy to beat

one thing that is very common on this forum is peoples dislike for boxers clouding their judgement

ignore fenster

other than ice he is the sites froch hater

Ice once said he could go the distance with manny pac

Uhh no i said i could possibly last 9 minutes, maybe i couldn't maybe i could. Who cares whats that got to do with anything ?

And why are you licking up HTH's ass ? are you the same person ? because you both act very alike.

Infact i know the MOD's may edit this comment which is fine, but i think your both a bunch of wind up merchants, if its not HTH on two accounts.

You both are totally clueless, and say any old rubbish. To get a rise out of people, honestly its like you two are from totally different planets.

Audley Harrison can beat the Klitschko brothers, Carl Froch whooped Dirrell/Kessler. And Carl Froch was ahead going into the last round vs Jermain Taylor ?

Are you kidding me ? do you actually believe this crap you spout out ?

Im not a hater of Carl Froch at all, i think he's exciting fighter and is willing to fight anybody. But just because he's British i don't totally erase his flaws from my mind, and claim any old bullshit like HTH does.

The fact is many people believe he lost to Andre Dirrell, Carl Froch didn't "whoop" or "whip" anyone.

A whooping is James Toney vs Iran Barkley/Joe Calzaghe vs Jeff Lacy.

Carl Froch vs Andre Dirrell was a messy/untidy fight, with not alot of action. But Andre Dirrell was able to make it his kind of fight, and Carl Froch struggled to land anything meaningful and was outboxed.

Against Mikkel Kessler he was outworked/outhustled, if the fight was in any doubt. Mikkel Kessler won the last round to seal the deal, he won the fight. With a good steady body/head attack.

Against Jermain Taylor he was behind going into the 12th round by atleast 3 rounds, anybody who had Carl Froch ahead. Is a clueless moron, it was a good win for Carl Froch. But to say he didn't need a KO in the last round is utter rubbish.

dude really, i think it is you who are clueless

admittedly I got carried away with the harrison klit thread mind

but heres one thing I feel very very strongly about and it has nothing to do with nationality, If dirrell had of been given the decision against froch it would have been an absolute tragedy and a very bad thing for boxing as a whole. I honestly believe the fight should have been stopped after a few rounds or dirrell at least get a very harsh warning. thousands of fans had paid a lot of money to be at the fight and to watch it on pay per view and they didnt pay that money to watch someone run a hold and generally spoil

Whether or not Andre Dirrell spoiled or was boring means jack shit, if he derserved to win he deserved to win end of. I mean what did Carl Froch do really himself ? yes he come forward but it has to be effective aggression. Carl Froch was just walking slowly forward throwing the odd punch and being rough on the inside.

But he wasn't landing effective punches, and he looked totally frustrated. Infact Andre Dirrell was the one that was able to rock Carl Froch in the 11th round. He was also able to keep the distance and outbox Carl Froch.

Yes it wasn't pretty, i never said it was. But just because Andre Dirrell was boring, doesn't mean he didn't deserve to win. I think most fans feel Andre Dirrell won by a few rounds.

And just for the record i don't like Andre Dirrell, and i'd rather Carl Froch win over Andre Dirrell any day of the week. But the way i scored it RBR, and the way most fans scored it. They had Andre Dirrell as the winner.

we are getting into the dirrell froch argument again now which i cant be bothered with

just be delighted as a boxing fan that froch won

boxing probably lost a number of half and half fans following that fight and if boxers were allowed to win world titles with those tactics it would loose many many more

[BIG H]

OK - Saying he "Whopped" Direll. NOBODY could objectively say either of those guys "Whopped" the other it was a dull nothing fight, there was no "Whopping"

So now you show me the posts where I talk about Froch gettled "Rocked by this guy and wobbled by this guy" Because that wasn't me that wrote that or any of the other posts. Mixing me up with Facster me thinks

Whopping isnt a real word, what does it mean?

you made a strong statement saying i cant be objective and thats the best you can do, i dont know if you have read the whole of this thread but earlier i said my money is on AA against froch, is that not objective?

You made statements about my dislike of a fighter etc and were quoting somebody else mate - go figure

"go figure"? are you sure your not american?

if thats what is getting your goat dude, i am sorry i mixed you up with some other dude

you have to admit tho its an easy mistake to make when a vast majority of board members have a severe dislike for certain boxers

Says the guy that just posted about "Ratting people out" on another thread.

There is a difference between disliking and being honest about.

e.g Nigel Benn is probably my favourite fighter of all time. Do I think he would've beaten Roy Jones, James Toney or Mike McCallum? No! Does that mean I dislike him? No!

[erics44]

Says the guy that just posted about "Ratting people out" on another thread.

There is a difference between disliking and being honest about.

e.g Nigel Benn is probably my favourite fighter of all time. Do I think he would've beaten Roy Jones, James Toney or Mike McCallum? No! Does that mean I dislike him? No!

ha, you can be quite funny when you want to be

cummon man, there is a difference but that isnt what is going on on here, peoples hate for boxers is clouding their judgement

i could probably list 10 occasions where this is happening with fensters posts, if i could be bothered reading through again

someone said in HTHs thread that neither froch nor kessler has any skill

man cummmoooonnnnnnnnnn

i would say i am the most "objective" (as you put it) and the least swayed by biast on this forum from what i have read so far

[Saddo]

It makes no difference if you like Froch or hate him... you still have to admire the way he blocks all them shots with his chin.

[HattonTheHammer]

go easy on erics H me old `china, he seems an alright bloke


saddo - when the f*ck are we gonna get this rep thing sorted out? absolutely ridiculous that someone as popular as me has such little punch power

[Saddo]

go easy on erics H me old `china, he seems an alright bloke


saddo - when the f*ck are we gonna get this rep thing sorted out? absolutely ridiculous that someone as popular as me has such little punch power

keep posting mate eventually you will be on the HOF for rep in no time... prob this time next year if you don't take any breaks

[Fenster]

Says the guy that just posted about "Ratting people out" on another thread.

There is a difference between disliking and being honest about.

e.g Nigel Benn is probably my favourite fighter of all time. Do I think he would've beaten Roy Jones, James Toney or Mike McCallum? No! Does that mean I dislike him? No!

ha, you can be quite funny when you want to be

cummon man, there is a difference but that isnt what is going on on here, peoples hate for boxers is clouding their judgement

i could probably list 10 occasions where this is happening with fensters posts, if i could be bothered reading through again

someone said in HTHs thread that neither froch nor kessler has any skill

man cummmoooonnnnnnnnnn

i would say i am the most "objective" (as you put it) and the least swayed by biast on this forum from what i have read so far

I'd like to read them. Just point out five, although I seriously recommend reading all Fensters posts, they are great. Fact.

[erics44]

I'd like to read them. Just point out five, although I seriously recommend reading all Fensters posts, they are great. Fact.

dont try an be a man now fencer old boy

[Fenster]

I'd like to read them. Just point out five, although I seriously recommend reading all Fensters posts, they are great. Fact.

dont try an be a man now fencer old boy

ok erica

i'll see you later as the blue bus is waiting for me

[erics44]

I'd like to read them. Just point out five, although I seriously recommend reading all Fensters posts, they are great. Fact.

dont try an be a man now fencer old boy

ok erica

i'll see you later as the blue bus is waiting for me

where are you going?