Quote Originally Posted by milmascaras1 View Post
morales,

mijo, these two fights are like apples and oranges. the pacquiao/marquez fights were much closer than the penalosa/de leon fight because at least pacquiao made a fight out of it. penalosa stood there like a complete dunce trying to counter whilst throwing 25-30 punches a round. now tell me, with zero knockdowns, do you actually expect a fighter to win a world title throwing so little punches? come on now, i know you're a little bit intelligent otherwise you woul;dn't be on this website, but let's not act stupid here. penalosa could have won but didn't do enough. you can't give it to him. the judges made the right call in the scoring. de leon made the fight and penalosa just stood there. end of story!!!
yet you're the only one saying De Leon won it, ummm and genious Pacquiao/Marquez and Penalosa/De Leon aren't really different at all, Pacquiao/De Leon were the ones coming forward and throwing more Marquez/Penalosa were the ones picking their shots and landing the cleaner more effective shots, where the hell is it said that the fighter who lands more shots wins the fight? especially when most of De Leon's shots were on Penalosa's guard, and most of Penalosa's shots were landing cleanly on his opponent, not too complicated to understand, just take off your Made in Mexico glasses