cheating

[Nameless]

I'm not saying either is right, but there is a huge difference between juicing yourself up, even giving yourself 25% more stamina, power, speed etc to smashing someone repeatedly in the head with a brick.

A brick will do far more damage. (I liken plaster to bricks)

Totally agreed.

[Jimanuel Boogustus]

In my honest opinion, a performance enhancing drug is a performance enhancing drug is a performance enhancing drug... It don't really matter if it's making you hit harder, fight for longer, or even making your willy bigger.

However, fighting with loaded gloves is just as cheap as cheap gets.

It's kinda like the difference between:
Fucking for a living.
Fucking on viagra for a living.
Fucking with a Dildo for a living.

There is a huge differential in the levels of insecurity and fraudulent activity

[Memphis]

When you put it that way it makes perfect sense

[Jimanuel Boogustus]

When you put it that way it makes perfect sense

They do come to me every now and then.

[erics44]

Ive been negged by PSL now

a pac man fan not liking a drug cheat thread

interesting

[erics44]

anyway i think everyone is missing the point

does it matter which is worse?

even if its miles worse the drugs cheats still cheated and they are loved

its easier to invisage plaster in a glove and the extra damage that it can do, its hard to ever tell how much extra drugs can give a fighter, i dont think you can really compare the two but they are both cheating

whom hates margs for cheating and loves hollyfield?

[brucelee]

anyway i think everyone is missing the point

does it matter which is worse?

even if its miles worse the drugs cheats still cheated and they are loved

its easier to invisage plaster in a glove and the extra damage that it can do, its hard to ever tell how much extra drugs can give a fighter, i dont think you can really compare the two but they are both cheating

whom hates margs for cheating and loves hollyfield?

To answer your question based on the feelings of many members here, more people hate Margarito than Holyfield.

Btw, I agree with you regarding the cheating part. Both are cheating and must be scorned. I don't agree, however, with the punishment you would like to impose to both offenses.

People here hate Margarito more because 1) he was caught in flagrante delicto of attempting to cheat 2) there is a probability that he used plaster with his fight against Cotto and the result of that felony/crime caused an apparent damage on Cotto.

[Jimanuel Boogustus]

anyway i think everyone is missing the point

No, your missing the point.

does it matter which is worse?

Yes, absolutely it does. If you take steroids then your taking illegal steps to better your prospects. If you load your gloves, it's done in one simple step. It's a cheaper than cheap shot.

even if its miles worse the drugs cheats still cheated and they are loved

I can only assume this relates to fighters who haven't been properly convicted Mosley/ Jones Jnr etc...?

its easier to invisage plaster in a glove and the extra damage that it can do, its hard to ever tell how much extra drugs can give a fighter, i dont think you can really compare the two but they are both cheating

Yep, your missing the point again. It's not directly about damage, it's about the measure of illicit short-cuts taken to inflict extra damage.

whom hates margs for cheating and loves hollyfield?

Again, this relates to the balance between accusations and actual convictions.

Boxing could and should do a lot more to enforce anti-doping but regardless, the apparent lack of competence in boxing's anti-doping regime unfortunately cannot rightfully qualify the likes of me & you to judge in it's absence.

[Saddo]

it's kinda like the difference between:
Fucking for a living.
Fucking on viagra for a living.
Fucking with a dildo for a living.

class ;d;d;d