Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Pacquiao on 60 Minutes, What will it do to PPV numbers?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao on 60 Minutes, What will it do to PPV numbers?

    If a fan is going to be obsessed with PPV figures, then I think they have their priorities all wrong. Sure it matters to the fighter and their promotion team, but I have never understood your average boxing fan really being concerned with such a thing.

    As a boxing fan, I don't think that should be the motivation. I just want to see a good scrap next weekend, I couldn't care less how many are buying it.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao on 60 Minutes, What will it do to PPV numbers?

    I just find it gay the way fanboys of certain fighters will get into ridiculous debates like "my fighter sold X amount of PPV's against Y fighter, whilst your fighter could only get X number of PPV's against Y fighter therefore my fighter should get Z more money!". Those kinds of arguments are incredibly gay and only fanboys could really go deeply into that kind of thing. Why do we care about the fighters potential split in a purse? Do they as fanboys somehow recieve a part of this oh so significant split when all said and done? It makes no sense to me. I for one watch boxing because I want to see great fights. Purses and PPV numbers are just an annoying distraction. For sure boxing is about making money, but you get selfish pricks like Floyd Mayweather as a consequence. Fighters can make money, but there is no need to deprive the public of quality matchups because the numbers have gone to your head. A real fan cares about the fights and a real fighter cares about his legacy (and bank balance). Only fanboys, promoters and egotistical fighters discuss PPV figures and justify avoiding the best fights.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    4,574
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1532
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao on 60 Minutes, What will it do to PPV numbers?

    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    I just find it gay the way fanboys of certain fighters will get into ridiculous debates like "my fighter sold X amount of PPV's against Y fighter, whilst your fighter could only get X number of PPV's against Y fighter therefore my fighter should get Z more money!". Those kinds of arguments are incredibly gay and only fanboys could really go deeply into that kind of thing. Why do we care about the fighters potential split in a purse? Do they as fanboys somehow recieve a part of this oh so significant split when all said and done? It makes no sense to me. I for one watch boxing because I want to see great fights. Purses and PPV numbers are just an annoying distraction. For sure boxing is about making money, but you get selfish pricks like Floyd Mayweather as a consequence. Fighters can make money, but there is no need to deprive the public of quality matchups because the numbers have gone to your head. A real fan cares about the fights and a real fighter cares about his legacy (and bank balance). Only fanboys, promoters and egotistical fighters discuss PPV figures and justify avoiding the best fights.

    I agree with you on that. That's why I'm beginning to love UFC.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dawson Springs, KY
    Posts
    8,430
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1479
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao on 60 Minutes, What will it do to PPV numbers?

    Quote Originally Posted by brucelee View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    I just find it gay the way fanboys of certain fighters will get into ridiculous debates like "my fighter sold X amount of PPV's against Y fighter, whilst your fighter could only get X number of PPV's against Y fighter therefore my fighter should get Z more money!". Those kinds of arguments are incredibly gay and only fanboys could really go deeply into that kind of thing. Why do we care about the fighters potential split in a purse? Do they as fanboys somehow recieve a part of this oh so significant split when all said and done? It makes no sense to me. I for one watch boxing because I want to see great fights. Purses and PPV numbers are just an annoying distraction. For sure boxing is about making money, but you get selfish pricks like Floyd Mayweather as a consequence. Fighters can make money, but there is no need to deprive the public of quality matchups because the numbers have gone to your head. A real fan cares about the fights and a real fighter cares about his legacy (and bank balance). Only fanboys, promoters and egotistical fighters discuss PPV figures and justify avoiding the best fights.

    I agree with you on that. That's why I'm beginning to love UFC.
    GTFO. Really?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    4,574
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1532
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao on 60 Minutes, What will it do to PPV numbers?

    yup. the past months I was away from Saddo got me addicted to UFC. LOL.

    who would not want UFC? It's bloodier, it's more exciting and people fight anybody. No long negotiations. They fight for the right to be called the best. try to watch it sometime and you'll know what i mean. I've particularly liked GSP.
    Last edited by brucelee; 11-09-2010 at 05:02 AM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    155
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    799
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao on 60 Minutes, What will it do to PPV numbers?

    Quote Originally Posted by brucelee View Post
    yup. the past months I was away from Saddo got me addicted to UFC. LOL.

    who would not want UFC? It's bloodier, it's more exciting and people fight anybody. No long negotiations. They fight for the right to be called the best. try to watch it sometime and you'll know what i mean. I've particularly liked GSP.
    Ya but anyone can bloody up someone when there wearing 4 ounce gloves on. making someone bleed with 8 or 10 ounce gloves on takes alot more skill. you do make a good point tho. I think alot of boxing promoters can learn a thing or two from UFC

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Pacquiao v. Clottey PPV Numbers
    By Rantcatrat in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-14-2010, 12:32 AM
  2. Pacquiao-Hatton PPV numbers
    By Lance Uppercut in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 05-15-2009, 05:37 PM
  3. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 02-02-2009, 05:39 AM
  4. HOLLAND WILL SCORE WITHIN THE FIRST 7 MINUTES
    By SalTheButcher in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-22-2006, 10:35 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing