C'mon VD... you know better than that. When did I say Duran was a classy guy? Matter of fact, I hated his reaction to Sugar Ray after their first fight, and was overjoyed when Hearns savagely knocked him out. But there's a subtle difference between Duran and Chavez. Duran was just a wild animal, working himself into a hatred of any opponent they put in front of him, and doing his best to pummel them into a pulp. Although I don't excuse his reaction after the 1st Leonard fight, it could be said he was just too worked up when the final bell sounded to behave like a sportsman.
Chavez... on the other hand, always seemed to me to be calculatingly hypocritical and too much into his precious little "0", as well as his march toward 100 wins. He discredited his opponents, and... even after he started fighting world class opposition, managed to sprinkle in a few "debutantes" and palookas with losing records. And while I know every great fighter takes a breather every now and then, they're usually not as blatant about it as Chavez apparently was.
What I still don't get is this backlash about my dislike for the guy and his bloated record. Granted... I've never said he doesn't belong in the HOF or that he isn't an all-time great fighter. Just that his record was bloated, that's all. And the "lack of amateur experience" argument just doesn't cut it. Because while he's entitled to a learning curve, like all other fighters, the bums he was beating up on should not have counted on his professional record... simple as that.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 


Reply With Quote
Bookmarks