Pac and Marquez are still about the same weight.

[milmascaras1]

psl,

so now you're calling me a "hater" because i still think marquez is as good or better than pacquiao? it's very interesting that here is pacquiao, supposedly the greatest fighter of all time, (according to pactards) and he won't fight the man who gave him the most trouble and schooled him? it tells you how bad the higher weight fighters are. or is it that marquez is just that good? PSL, name me one FAST and YOUNG fighter pacquiao has faced in the last 7-8 years? the one he did face was agapito sanchez and pacquiao wanted to quit because he was getting bullied. pacquiao even ducked joan guzman when pacquiao was at super featherweight and guzman was still a super bantamweight. that is humiliating. hell, even marquez traveled to the philippines and went up to pacquiao's face and told him he wanted a rematch in front of all of pacquiao's fans and all pacquiao could do is utter "uh, aa, i, wazzz, uh, aa, lucky". lol...marquez put his ass on the spot and pacquiao had one of those "wanna get away"? moments. call me a hater if you will just like every pactard fan who doesn't agree that he is the greatest of all time, but something is very fishy in the way team pacquiao does business. look, devon alexander, amir khan, andre berto and timothy bradley are all available but no, arum wants to fight the 39 year old mosley who looks like he's ready for the grave. until pacquiao starts fighting and beating prime, fast fighters, i will consider him a fraud and a fake. other websites have caught on to this fake flake.

[milmascaras1]

neutral,

yes i do consider the 2nd pacquiao/marquez fight a robbery. it's funny how bob arum wanted to install one of his judges he handpicked to be a judge. something is very fishy. i had marquez winning easily by three points. FYI, knockdowns alone do not determine fights. it's who wins most of the rounds and marquez won at least 8 rounds.

[InTheNeutralCorner]

neutral,

yes i do consider the 2nd pacquiao/marquez fight a robbery. it's funny how bob arum wanted to install one of his judges he handpicked to be a judge. something is very fishy. i had marquez winning easily by three points. FYI, knockdowns alone do not determine fights. it's who wins most of the rounds and marquez won at least 8 rounds.

Three points isn't even a robbery considering that scoring in boxing is subjective unless one fighter is clearly ahead in the rounds. But that is your opinon. Now, if you have said that you think JMM was ahead by eight points, then I can understand you to think it was a robbery.