De La Hoya: Pacquiao makes fighters lose on the scales 1st

[miron_lang]

Sorry but your posts are ridiculous. So in your OWN words, it's not usually a big deal for a fighter to come down a couple of pounds and still beat up the little guy, it's what you would expect.

But because Pacquiao beats them, then obviously this proves the exception where the loss of a pound was pivotal and turned the fight result on its head?

Bigger men like Hopkins goes down and beat the smaller fighter

but if its Pacquiao. The smaller man beat up the bigger men because he weight drains him.

classic!!


LOL!

[Hornfinger]

Sorry but your posts are ridiculous. So in your OWN words, it's not usually a big deal for a fighter to come down a couple of pounds and still beat up the little guy, it's what you would expect.

But because Pacquiao beats them, then obviously this proves the exception where the loss of a pound was pivotal and turned the fight result on its head?

Bigger men like Hopkins goes down and beat the smaller fighter

but if its Pacquiao. The smaller man beat up the bigger men because he weight drains him.

classic!!


LOL!

The question is, are Pacroids opponants weakend/weight drained due to having to come down in weight? Well I'd say yes cuz they've all looked cack and lost.

Was Hopkins weight drained? Hard to tell cuz he won easily.

Why did no one make a fuss about B-Hop coming down? Because he won easily, and he was fighting ODH the most popular fighter in the sport who everyone want to win the fight.

Does that make it easy for you to understand?

[Hornfinger]

And finally.........

If pacroid had lost to DLH, Cotto and margarito would we be having this conversation? No because there would be no debate. Those fighters would have won so you can't debate the reason why they lost.....