How To Beat Manny Pacquiao

[:::PSL:::]

Get to know his ring habit/tricks first...



Pacquiao Boxing Trick #1: Tap Block, Tap Jab

Pacquiao Boxing Trick #2: Right Hook Counter Over Left Jab

Pacquiao Boxing Trick #3: One-Legged Lead Left

Pacquiao Boxing Trick #4: Double-Left Sneak

Pacquiao Boxing Trick #5: Triangle Guard

Pacquiao Boxing Trick #6: Left Step, Left Cross

Pacquiao Boxing Trick #7: Vertical Jab

Pacquiao Boxing Trick #8: Forearm Defense

Pacquiao Boxing Trick #9: Rear Overhand Left

Pacquiao Boxing Trick #10: Left High, Left Low


http://sportales.com/sports/how-to-beat-manny-pacquiao/

Many boxers wants to risk losing and be beaten black-and-blue just to get big money fighting Manny Pacquiao. And there is this one top fighter who are very qualified and as skilled but is afraid to risk getting his first ever lost. Here’s how to beat the world’s no.1 Pound-for-Pound fighter and find out why one fighter is hesitant to fight him.

When he fought Marco Antonio Barrera the first time, P4P no.1 Manny Pacquiao was a huge underdog. He was never given a chance to win and many of his countrymen thought too. When Pacquiao faced the bigger Oscar de la Hoya, his chance of winning was close to impossible and Roach’s prediction was thought to be just a dream.

The failure to make the match between BWAA Fighter of the Decade Manny Pacquiao and undefeated former P4P no. 1 Floyd Mayweather Jr. is perceived now as caused by Floyd’s fear of losing.

World’s most watched and studied fighter
Manny Pacquiao’s climb to the top of the boxing world is amazing. Winning 9 world titles in 7 different weight divisions is an amazing and hard-to-beat feat. His accomplishments make him now the most feared and hard-to-beat fighter in the world. He is now the world’s most watched and studied boxer and his style of fighting is no secret for it is forever recorded in the annals of the sweet science.
So how can you beat the great Manny Pacquiao at his peak and at his great physical condition?

Speed kills. You got to have speed. If not faster, be equal. Speed had been Pacquiao’s advantage in his every fight. It is Manny’s fast movements of his feet, his head, his body and his punches. He has punches that can hit its targets accurately. And to hit the targets accurately, one got to think fast. Manny thinks fast and moves automatically because he developed an instinct.

The Pacquiao instinct. You got to neutralize Pacquiao’s instinct. Pacquiao developed his instinct with his offensive fighting style since he started boxing at a young age. He can read his opponent’s movements that’s why he knows when, where and how to hit. Observe Manny in initiating his punches in his past fights. Manny always look at the eyes of his opponents. Once they blink, Manny hits. When they cover their eyes with their gloves, Manny throws a punch or deliver combinations. When they put their guards down, Manny attacks. And when his opponent hits first, Pacquiao counters fast even in an awkward angle. Remember Manny’s no-look punches particularly in his last fight with Juan Manuel Marquez? Marquez never saw it coming. So one must think ahead of Pacquiao and fast. Marquez so far is the closest who have this fighting instinct that’s why Manny had a hard time with him. Marquez developed an instinct with his counterpunches. When you have that instinct, the punches will be automatic and fast. Marquez’s only big problem was he don’t hit hard as Manny.

Killer punches. You got to have power in your punches. This is one of the greatest assets of Manny. All of his punches are intended to knock his opponents out. Because of Manny’s offensive style of fighting since the early days, the muscles in his arms were developed to punch hard and kill. This is why Freddie Roach has been telling that story of how he met Pacquiao. Pacquiao’s legendary first punches with the Roach mitts that started the lethal combination of the world’s best trainer and fighter.

Physical advantages work best in distance. You got to use your advantage in reach, height and weight. Manny’s amazing feat of winning in the higher weight divisions were primarily because his best opponents there were not as fast as Manny. So if you are taller with an advantage in reach, the best strategy is to maintain distance. Don’t make Pacquiao’s punches reach its targets. De La Hoya, Hatton and Cotto took risks and got knocked out. Joshua Clottey tried but clamped up. Once he tasted Manny’s power punches, he decided to just defend himself and finish the fight standing. Clottey never took a risk.

Train hard and get that stamina. You got to have stamina if not more but equally with Pacquiao. Pacquiao attacks non-stop and wears his opponents out. His opponents – they all slowed down in the later rounds. While the well-conditioned Manny who is a hardworking machine during training will throw you killer punches from the first to the final rounds.


Be brave and take risk. You got to have courage. Fighting Manny Pacquiao is a great risk for anyone’s physical well-being and boxing career. Anyone will develop fear after watching how Pacquiao dealt with David Diaz, Oscar de la Hoya, Miguel Cotto and his devastating KO of Ricky Hatton. The more feared Pacquiao has become. The only courage you can get fighting Manny Pacquiao will come from the big money you will be getting fighting him.

Have all these qualities and make an intelligent fight plan
There are other things you must have in order to beat Manny Pacquiao but these are the first and most important requirements where you can conceive the best fight plan and strategy to defeat him. Get an excellent trainer like Freddie Roach.
These are the things you need to have that chance to beat one of the world’s greatest fighters – Manny Pacquiao.

Good luck!

[ICB]

Do alot of swimming, thought i'd get that out the way before anyone else beats me to it. As for the thread you put alot of effort into that bro good job.

I don't feel like really going into it at the moment, because i've got to go out. But the first thing is you have to be a good counter puncher. You have to stand your ground at times so Manny Pacquiao don't overwhelm you., and you have to have a good chin and good defense.

There's no really one way to beat Manny Pacquiao, which is why he's so hard to be. Because you've got to be very good at multiple things.

[milmascaras1]

there is no question pacquiao is at the top of his game now and he's been beating all the welterweights with big names. but unfortunately, that's all they are, big names. none of these welters aren't very good, or were good at one time (shane mosley) but obviously have gotten old and washed up.

i believe today's fighters pale in comparison to fighters of the eighties, nineties and early 2000's. i mean seriously, if a little guy like juan manuel marquez could take pacquiao see the devil twice, i would have wondered how pacquiao would have done with boxers from these two eras, 80's and 90's. and please, don't tell me pacquiao has improved from one fight, marquez to the david diaz fight. these two are totally different opponents.

i think pacquiao is very fortunate to have been fighting at a time when morales and marquez were old and out of their primes. another thing, if a very pedestrian antonio margarito can hurt pacquiao, how would pacquiao fare against a prime shane mosley, prime de la hoya, prime ike quartey etc...?

below is a list of fighters from the eighties and nineties who would/could have beaten pacquiao, starting from the lower weights. remember, all these fighters would be in their PRIME, with no catchweights or weight drains, something pacquiao is famous for:

super bantamweights - a prime wilfredo gomez destroys pacquiao in less than 5 rounds. nobody ever came close to dominating a division as easily as this great champion did.

featherweights - so pacquiao has trouble fighting counter punchers? he'd have a hell of a time surviving against salvador sanchez. sanchez had the height, length, skills to beat pacquiao by UD and maybe even TKO late.

azumah nelson - i don't care what anybody says but i think nelson would have destroyed a very clumsy pacquiao. nelson was a very underrated boxer and would have imposed his tremendous will and KO'd him.

naseem hamed - very good fight. pacquiao had him speed wise but hamed had him power wise. toss up fight with multiple knockdowns.

danny "little red" lopez - lopez had little defense but so does pacquiao. i would probably favor pacquiao by decision if he can survive lopez' power.

eusebio pedroza - another very underrated champion. made something like 16 title defenses and fought everyone and everything. a bit of a dirty fighter which would have seriously frustrated pacquiao (agapito sanchez). a very close fight to call.

super featherweight - alexis arguello would have been much too powerful for little pacquiao. in his prime, he was one of the very best all-time. would have taken some rounds to get pacquiao but he would catch up to him and KO him in the later rounds.

lightweights - i think edwin rosario beats pacquiao as well as ken buchanan. esteban de jesus was also a very underrated boxer who would have given pacquiao fits. ray mancini was one tough SOB and it would have been very interesting to see this fight.

jr. welters - i know aaron pryor, julio cesar chavez, meldrick taylor, hector camacho and pernell whitaker beat pacquiao. kostya tszyu would be a toss up. these fighters are no ricky hatton's of the world.

welters - remember, all prime fighters - oscar de la hoya, sugar ray leonard, thomas hearns, roberto duran, felix trinidad, donald curry, lloyd honeyghan, vernon forrest, pipino cuevas, ike quartey, wilfredo benitez and terry norris were all too strong and all of these guys hit very hard (except benitez). but it wouldn't matter if they were fighting in pacquiao's era because freddie roach would never let pacquiao fight these guys unless they were old and at catchweights.

pacquiao has never dominated any division in his life and the one he's come close to (welter) have been at catchweight with old, slow fighters. another thing, i believe the reason why pacquiao looks so fantastic fighting these old guys is because they are slow or old or at catchweights and they don't offer much of a resistance. when pacquiao fought marquez, you didn't see him go in there punching away because he knew marquez would counter him all night long. he had to think before he mixed it up with marquez unlike fighters like margarito, de la hoya, david diaz, washed up morales, limited hatton etc...

the fighters i mentioned from yesteryear would have all been too dangerous for pacquiao to fight, and i'll bet pacquiao wouldn't be going up in weight so fast with impunity the way he's doing now because the bigger names at welterweight are getting old and can't compare to the boxers of the eighties and nineties.

what pacquiao has done is very admirable because he's gone up in weight and beaten bigger guys, albeit, guys who weren't very good or old. but let's not get too carried away with these questionable accomplishments because they are questionable. as humans, we're enamored so much with the current. take mike tyson. i'll bet most of you fans thought tyson was the greatest heavyweight of all time when he was beating nobodies in the late 80's! i always knew he was lucky to have fought at a very weak division at the time and if he would have fought in the 70's, he wouldn't been just another good heavyweight contender.

and PSL, stop with this nonsense about what is the best way to beat pacquiao!!! quit feeding him old fighters and put him in with younger in their prime fighters and he'll answer your question. you make it sound as if pacquiao has this secret of fighting that can never be duplicated. his style is very complicated but with the right opponent, he can be beaten emphatically. sorry to burst your bubble because he's the only boxer you've known but it is what it is.

and i'm waiting for all the pactards on this forum to let me have it. i can just read your comments like "how dare milmascaras question pacquiao's greatness"? ban him, ban him.

[ono]

DO A LOT OF SWIMM.....



Ah fucking hell, he's already got it in there.

[Ant Live]

I tell you how to beat Manny.

Push a man in the corner.
Insult his character.
Catch him hitting women.
Send him to jail.
Take his kids away from him.
Take his money away.
Offer him 30+ million dollars
Offer a rematch clause worth 50 million dollars


Thats how you beat Manny

[generalbulldog]

Hide his favorite pair of socks.

[Hornfinger]

how to beat manny Pacquiao?

Easy, insist on a fair fight.

Random drug tests before the fight carried out by a nutral testing body
No catch weights

[Mar]

....Don't let him weight drain you.

[Chino]

how to beat manny Pacquiao?

Random drug tests before the fight carried out by a nutral testing body
No catch weights

....Don't let him weight drain you.

[zhubin]

How to beat Manny?! IMO...Marquez beat him twice. You can also beat him by not being 1) one dimensional 2) past your prime 3) weight drained from trying to make a catch weight. You definitely don't want to be all three. haha!

[Jimanuel Boogustus]

Control the range. Easy!

[Taeth]

there is no question pacquiao is at the top of his game now and he's been beating all the welterweights with big names. but unfortunately, that's all they are, big names. none of these welters aren't very good, or were good at one time (shane mosley) but obviously have gotten old and washed up.

i believe today's fighters pale in comparison to fighters of the eighties, nineties and early 2000's. i mean seriously, if a little guy like juan manuel marquez could take pacquiao see the devil twice, i would have wondered how pacquiao would have done with boxers from these two eras, 80's and 90's. and please, don't tell me pacquiao has improved from one fight, marquez to the david diaz fight. these two are totally different opponents.

i think pacquiao is very fortunate to have been fighting at a time when morales and marquez were old and out of their primes. another thing, if a very pedestrian antonio margarito can hurt pacquiao, how would pacquiao fare against a prime shane mosley, prime de la hoya, prime ike quartey etc...?

below is a list of fighters from the eighties and nineties who would/could have beaten pacquiao, starting from the lower weights. remember, all these fighters would be in their PRIME, with no catchweights or weight drains, something pacquiao is famous for:

super bantamweights - a prime wilfredo gomez destroys pacquiao in less than 5 rounds. nobody ever came close to dominating a division as easily as this great champion did.

featherweights - so pacquiao has trouble fighting counter punchers? he'd have a hell of a time surviving against salvador sanchez. sanchez had the height, length, skills to beat pacquiao by UD and maybe even TKO late.

azumah nelson - i don't care what anybody says but i think nelson would have destroyed a very clumsy pacquiao. nelson was a very underrated boxer and would have imposed his tremendous will and KO'd him.

naseem hamed - very good fight. pacquiao had him speed wise but hamed had him power wise. toss up fight with multiple knockdowns.

danny "little red" lopez - lopez had little defense but so does pacquiao. i would probably favor pacquiao by decision if he can survive lopez' power.

eusebio pedroza - another very underrated champion. made something like 16 title defenses and fought everyone and everything. a bit of a dirty fighter which would have seriously frustrated pacquiao (agapito sanchez). a very close fight to call.

super featherweight - alexis arguello would have been much too powerful for little pacquiao. in his prime, he was one of the very best all-time. would have taken some rounds to get pacquiao but he would catch up to him and KO him in the later rounds.

lightweights - i think edwin rosario beats pacquiao as well as ken buchanan. esteban de jesus was also a very underrated boxer who would have given pacquiao fits. ray mancini was one tough SOB and it would have been very interesting to see this fight.

jr. welters - i know aaron pryor, julio cesar chavez, meldrick taylor, hector camacho and pernell whitaker beat pacquiao. kostya tszyu would be a toss up. these fighters are no ricky hatton's of the world.

welters - remember, all prime fighters - oscar de la hoya, sugar ray leonard, thomas hearns, roberto duran, felix trinidad, donald curry, lloyd honeyghan, vernon forrest, pipino cuevas, ike quartey, wilfredo benitez and terry norris were all too strong and all of these guys hit very hard (except benitez). but it wouldn't matter if they were fighting in pacquiao's era because freddie roach would never let pacquiao fight these guys unless they were old and at catchweights.

pacquiao has never dominated any division in his life and the one he's come close to (welter) have been at catchweight with old, slow fighters. another thing, i believe the reason why pacquiao looks so fantastic fighting these old guys is because they are slow or old or at catchweights and they don't offer much of a resistance. when pacquiao fought marquez, you didn't see him go in there punching away because he knew marquez would counter him all night long. he had to think before he mixed it up with marquez unlike fighters like margarito, de la hoya, david diaz, washed up morales, limited hatton etc...

the fighters i mentioned from yesteryear would have all been too dangerous for pacquiao to fight, and i'll bet pacquiao wouldn't be going up in weight so fast with impunity the way he's doing now because the bigger names at welterweight are getting old and can't compare to the boxers of the eighties and nineties.

what pacquiao has done is very admirable because he's gone up in weight and beaten bigger guys, albeit, guys who weren't very good or old. but let's not get too carried away with these questionable accomplishments because they are questionable. as humans, we're enamored so much with the current. take mike tyson. i'll bet most of you fans thought tyson was the greatest heavyweight of all time when he was beating nobodies in the late 80's! i always knew he was lucky to have fought at a very weak division at the time and if he would have fought in the 70's, he wouldn't been just another good heavyweight contender.

and PSL, stop with this nonsense about what is the best way to beat pacquiao!!! quit feeding him old fighters and put him in with younger in their prime fighters and he'll answer your question. you make it sound as if pacquiao has this secret of fighting that can never be duplicated. his style is very complicated but with the right opponent, he can be beaten emphatically. sorry to burst your bubble because he's the only boxer you've known but it is what it is.

and i'm waiting for all the pactards on this forum to let me have it. i can just read your comments like "how dare milmascaras question pacquiao's greatness"? ban him, ban him.

This is stupid.

[milmascaras1]

taeth,

why is it stupid? i guess the truth hurts alot!

[:::PSL:::]

taeth,

why is it stupid? i guess the truth hurts alot!

What truth? It seems to me you're the one who is hurting by being sensitive with this topic.

[milmascaras1]

PSL,

i just wanted to dispel the notion that pacquiao is the GOAT! he's far from it. he's a great fighter but you peeps act as if they will never be another one like him, which is outrageous. again, he's great but he's been cherrypicking his opponents since the marquez II fight. gotta tell ya, bob arum is a master of disillusion and has done a great job carefully placing pacquiao in winnable fights. like i said before, he's lucky to have fought when he is because he would be just another good fighter in another era like the 80's and 90's. sorry!