i'll go with carl froch. i think he's the UK's best fighter. amir khan, although very good, is a bit overrated!
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
i'll go with carl froch. i think he's the UK's best fighter. amir khan, although very good, is a bit overrated!
Array
Got to go with Froch, his comp has been higher, he regained his title and the old dog learnt new tricks for Abraham.
Difficult one, personally I'm going to say I back the underdog in Froch, as he goes about his business despite the public view and gets the job done at a top class level. He's so underrated by the mainstream due to the shoddy promoting, and deserves to be a household name.
However, he lacks the 'personality' that this award demands. Therefore Haye is the inevitable choice in the publics opinion. Fighting on British soil, and capturing the non-boxing viewing public. His personality sells fights, along with his ability.
Khan has a good case after his performance against Maidana.
As I said though for me, Froch, definitely from a boxing fans perspective. He deserves some attention too.
Got a bit mixed up with the shitty BBC sports personality that I watched there![]()
Last edited by somnolence; 12-19-2010 at 11:13 PM.
Array
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks