Winky Wright vs Matthew Macklin on April 9th

[bzkfn]

if they met i dont think it would have anything to do with accademics, i think it would be a close fight tho

our conversation is about "better known" dude, macklin says what he says, barker says what he says, they are on a similar level (in my opinion), yet macklin has a much bigger profile, do you think there might be a link?

The average man on the street wouldn't have a clue who either of them are. Barker's profile isn't as high in boxing terms because his promoter doesn't have a TV deal. I wouldn't say Macklin's profile is that much bigger though. Maybe after Winky it will be. Our conversation was about why I thought Macklin was an idiot. By now, he should have been backing up his boasts. I have seen nothing that makes me think he's as good as he says he is.

Koppas, sorry bout the million quotes. I'm in work...the button is right there...I was being lazy.

[erics44]

if they met i dont think it would have anything to do with accademics, i think it would be a close fight tho

our conversation is about "better known" dude, macklin says what he says, barker says what he says, they are on a similar level (in my opinion), yet macklin has a much bigger profile, do you think there might be a link?

The average man on the street wouldn't have a clue who either of them are. Barker's profile isn't as high in boxing terms because his promoter doesn't have a TV deal. I wouldn't say Macklin's profile is that much bigger though. Maybe after Winky it will be. Our conversation was about why I thought Macklin was an idiot. By now, he should have been backing up his boasts. I have seen nothing that makes me think he's as good as he says he is.

Koppas, sorry bout the million quotes. I'm in work...the button is right there...I was being lazy.

i thought our conversation had progressed to the bigger picture dude

[bzkfn]

if they met i dont think it would have anything to do with accademics, i think it would be a close fight tho

our conversation is about "better known" dude, macklin says what he says, barker says what he says, they are on a similar level (in my opinion), yet macklin has a much bigger profile, do you think there might be a link?

The average man on the street wouldn't have a clue who either of them are. Barker's profile isn't as high in boxing terms because his promoter doesn't have a TV deal. I wouldn't say Macklin's profile is that much bigger though. Maybe after Winky it will be. Our conversation was about why I thought Macklin was an idiot. By now, he should have been backing up his boasts. I have seen nothing that makes me think he's as good as he says he is.

Koppas, sorry bout the million quotes. I'm in work...the button is right there...I was being lazy.

i thought our conversation had progressed to the bigger picture dude

I still answered you though

[erics44]

if they met i dont think it would have anything to do with accademics, i think it would be a close fight tho

our conversation is about "better known" dude, macklin says what he says, barker says what he says, they are on a similar level (in my opinion), yet macklin has a much bigger profile, do you think there might be a link?

The average man on the street wouldn't have a clue who either of them are. Barker's profile isn't as high in boxing terms because his promoter doesn't have a TV deal. I wouldn't say Macklin's profile is that much bigger though. Maybe after Winky it will be. Our conversation was about why I thought Macklin was an idiot. By now, he should have been backing up his boasts. I have seen nothing that makes me think he's as good as he says he is.

Koppas, sorry bout the million quotes. I'm in work...the button is right there...I was being lazy.

i thought our conversation had progressed to the bigger picture dude

I still answered you though

did you? well done

my missus made far too many ginger bread men with my kids at the weekend, there is still a tupperware tub full of them in the kitchen and i cant stop eating them

she has good skills in cake making