Oldschool Briliance

**Jimanuel Boogustus** · 02-01-2011 12:12 PM

I'm sure the ref is still there, counting while the doctor is rolling him over...

**Nameless** · 02-01-2011 12:20 PM

In my opinion, movement wise, 2 of the greatest tactitians have been The mangoose Archie Moore and Marvin HAgler, these 2 knew where to get the guys exactly where they wanted it in a position to hit them with combos.

**donnydarkoIRL** · 02-01-2011 02:04 PM

Ezzard Charles was another great master of ring generalship

**nikola_ganchev** · 02-01-2011 05:17 PM

Ezzard was briliant, but i think he used the how idea different from lets say Walcott, Moore and Burley. I have watch closely only the havywaight fights from him and for me this makes sence. He is staying all the time sideways and jabing. If his oponent wants so badly to punch Ezzard he must go throug the sholder ... which places his head at perfect positioning to be hit. And i like that he uses most as counter the left hook(in the same movements Tonney preferes the right). He is all the time safe! Its sad to see such an athlet don't going all out. The dead of Sam Baroudi must have been a great shock for him

But never the less when some one whant to watch solid deffence and smart boxinf Ezzard is the guy!
Where Charles was smartly outboxing his oponents the oder 3 forced their game on the oponent. They were awlays fainting, sucking and moving.

I want to give some examples of bad understanding of the principles... Klitschko vs. Arreola. When i heared Arreola saying that he has worked on his head movement i have already cholked myself. Watch him running away from the left in ... the straight right!

**Jimanuel Boogustus** · 02-02-2011 10:31 AM

Although I've noticed that Vitali is very good at manoeuvring people into his right hand a lot.

**SugarBoxing** · 12-07-2013 10:37 AM

@nikola_ganchev

good read!

I am trying to decipher your post...

feeds = feet?

"With this stances we have 3 lines on which we generate maximum impact force... "

Which ones? You only name one: "In the sideways stance this is the centerline itself."

"About the square stance if we imagine that our feeds are the end ponts of the hypotenuse of a right angled triangle with equal sides than the oder to lines of fire are the axis with go through the sides of the triangle (i hope this makes sance)"

It is VERY HARD to comprehend

Could you explain a bit better alll the pictures you posted and what do the lines mean (apart from the centerline, which is obvious). Also what do the "circles" mean?