Re: Kelly pavlik vs Carl froch

Originally Posted by
Rantcatrat

Originally Posted by
erics44
this is turning into yet another froch bashing thread
froch is a quality world class fighter who undoubtable deserves to be top 10 pound for pound in the world at the moment
even if froch wins the super 6 and then goes on to beat hopkins or whoever at light heavy and then wins the heavyweight title and then becomes king of England people will always have excuses
well Ward was past his best in the final and he was always overrated anyway, and hopkins had finally become an old man when they fought and his pet rabbit had just died so he was emotional, and the klits saw a mouse
cummon lads, like him or not just admit it, he is a top notch quality fighter
Just so you know where I stand, erics44, I believe Froch is rated where he should be. To me, his stock went down when he lost to Kessler. I understand that it was close, but Kessler is a fight Froch should have won, but didn't. He should be undefeated int he tournament right now. Thus, I rank him lower than Ward. And although he hasn't fought the same level of competition as Froch, I like Bute's potential more than Froch's. I have it Ward, Bute, and then Froch in order for the division.
perhaps it is your opinion that bute is better than froch but there is nothing to suggest that bute could be above him in any ranking system
Ward perhaps could be higher than froch purely from the kessler fights, that win over kessler aside Ward doesnt have a record as good as froch
Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend
Bookmarks