Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 52

Thread: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,979
    Mentioned
    1704 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3141
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    The fact that this is ppv means it is a waste of space.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,949
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    943
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Quote Originally Posted by TheMacMagician View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by koppas View Post
    Khan:

    This is a matchup the British public want to see and will be a fantastic fight between two of the best light welterweights in the country."
    No it isn't.
    No one else at Light Welter in this country pal. So I say yes it is.....

    Good fight IMO. McCloskey can be an awkward fukka. Better fight than the Peterson fight for me...
    I should've highlighted the 'This is a matchup the British public want to see...'

    The public wanted to see him fight either Prescott or Murray.
    Hidden Content

    www.twitter.com/BoxingBantz

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sunderland, England
    Posts
    1,705
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    909
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Don't think I'll be parting with £15 for this one. I don't mind it as its just a stay busy fight before Bradley, but I don't have any interest in seeing it. Better opponent than Junior Witter I suppose

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,979
    Mentioned
    1704 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3141
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Quote Originally Posted by Cressa121 View Post
    Don't think I'll be parting with £15 for this one. I don't mind it as its just a stay busy fight before Bradley, but I don't have any interest in seeing it. Better opponent than Junior Witter I suppose
    This should be free as a taster for his next fight which should be against Bradley, that would be worth ppv.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    22
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    I guess this is a stay busy fight for the champion.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,949
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    943
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    The ONLY way I will pay for this is if John Murray fights Jorge Linares on the undercard.
    Hidden Content

    www.twitter.com/BoxingBantz

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Peak District
    Posts
    2,036
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    946
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by koppas View Post
    The ONLY way I will pay for this is if John Murray fights Jorge Linares on the undercard.
    Would be a good fight that. Word over twitter is that Murray has big news this week. Hope so. The guy deserves his shot. Come on Mick, pull yer finger out.

    I'm gonna go to this fight for sure, I like the match-up.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    983
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Quote Originally Posted by Cressa121 View Post
    Don't think I'll be parting with £15 for this one. I don't mind it as its just a stay busy fight before Bradley, but I don't have any interest in seeing it. Better opponent than Junior Witter I suppose
    why wouldnt you pay for it? what are you gonna do instead?

    id like to have seen him fight witter

    much better opponent that peterson or ortiz
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    801
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    804
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !


  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    I am not interested in this fight. Peterson was a much better opponent IMO. No, just not into it at all. A big anti climax after Maidana. He better fight Bradley after this, October would be ideal. Maybe Bradley could get another warm up in between too to polish up his tools and see if he can have a clean fight with someone.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,466
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1429
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Not going to bother paying for this i don't think. Not a bad match up, but it's not worth £15.
    http://instagram.com/jonnyboy_85_/

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    983
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    I am not interested in this fight. Peterson was a much better opponent IMO. No, just not into it at all. A big anti climax after Maidana. He better fight Bradley after this, October would be ideal. Maybe Bradley could get another warm up in between too to polish up his tools and see if he can have a clean fight with someone.

    how is peterson a better opponent?

    if khan fought peterson it would be one way traffic until he stopped him mid to late rounds at the latest, no chance of a peterson win

    at least mccousky brings awkwardness a bit of power and a lot of fans
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    mccloskey Ko 3 against the glass chinned khan

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sunderland, England
    Posts
    1,705
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    909
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Cressa121 View Post
    Don't think I'll be parting with £15 for this one. I don't mind it as its just a stay busy fight before Bradley, but I don't have any interest in seeing it. Better opponent than Junior Witter I suppose
    why wouldnt you pay for it? what are you gonna do instead?

    id like to have seen him fight witter

    much better opponent that peterson or ortiz
    As the fight's in April I don't know what I'll be doing. I'm not paying to watch a fight I have no interest in though. I won't criticise Khan for his selection because he seems to be just fitting in another fight before he takes on Bradley. I'd have preferred Ortiz would have been a good opponent, as would Peterson. I don't think Khan would have had too much difficulty winning it but he's a solid all round fighter that might have extended Khan a bit. Witter would have been a shocking opponent. Like I said I'm not criticising Khan for this, but I just don't care enough to pay for it.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    None of your buisness.
    Posts
    7,691
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1812
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Khan vs McCloskey Signed !

    Who is convinced that McCloskey will not last 4 rounds? I will take sig bets first come first served on that nonsense. Jeez he only keeps his hands low to trick em into throwing a shot, he's a poor mans RJJ, who says he is not fast?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 45
    Last Post: 02-04-2011, 06:02 PM
  2. Khan v McCloskey
    By erics44 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 01-20-2011, 03:57 PM
  3. Anyone Heard Of Paul McCloskey
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 12-16-2009, 02:02 PM
  4. Colin Lynes - Paul McCloskey
    By Phil in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-03-2008, 11:02 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing