Hector Camacho Sr. vs. Ricky Hatton

**Spicoli** · 02-13-2011 12:36 AM

Ya know. Gotta side with Haugen being the better boxer. Paz was a showman, fast and hectic, better boxing early in career but the fights between them aside I say Haugen better fundamentals, off the top brainstorming it....biggest capable 'name' Paz ever beat pre and maybe post near life ending car accident was, well, Haugen

**THE THIRD MAN** · 02-13-2011 06:10 AM

Camacho may have been dumb outside the ring, but inside the ring was a different story, he was only ever genuinely beaten by true champions Chavez, Trinidad and DLH...all by decision. He was crafty and extremely fast, stylisitcally he would have been a nightmare for Hatton. I could never understand why he never fought Whitaker? Hatton would have to go for the balls in this one!

**Hulk** · 02-13-2011 06:59 AM

Originally Posted by THE THIRD MAN

Camacho may have been dumb outside the ring, but inside the ring was a different story, he was only ever genuinely beaten by true champions Chavez, Trinidad and DLH...all by decision. He was crafty and extremely fast, stylisitcally he would have been a nightmare for Hatton. I could never understand why he never fought Whitaker? Hatton would have to go for the balls in this one!

HAHAHA !

He'd need his buddy good ol Dave Parris too.

**brocktonblockbust** · 02-15-2011 09:17 AM

camacho is overrated. ask larry merchant.

**johnsebastianmiran** · 02-17-2011 05:02 AM

It's after the fact that we know Camacho was hell bent on survival after Rosario. He could run circles around Hatton and As Old Guard mentioned, Hatton is quick but just like the starving dog that caught a rabbit, he was starving so long he forgot he had teeth and didn't know what to do once he trapped Mayweather. It's the starving dog and the rabbit in that ring.