Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 33

Thread: The Solution: Create a Superheavyweight Division FAST!

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1530
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Solution: Create a Superheavyweight Division FAST!

    I think it's more that smaller heavyweights have to stop being lazy. Sure they will be a big size disadvantage against the klitschko's, but I think it's more of a case that the Klitschko's are special talents then anything. I mean look how many guys have beaten Valuev who are around six feet tall. What's special about the brothers is that they are smart, very athletic, economic and they get the most out of their natural advantages.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,364
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1421
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Solution: Create a Superheavyweight Division FAST!

    I think some people are forgetting that Heavyweights are so isolated from the cruiser-weight division. Not only that but not many Light-Heavyweights travel up to Cruiser-weight these days either...

    It would benefit boxing if there was a Re-Hash somewhere along the line... Maybe the Cruiser weight division could go back to 190lbs and maybe a super-cruiser weight division with a limit of 210lbs could be introduced?

    I know that straight away most septics would immediately assume that because the Cruiser-weight division is shit, that the Super-Cruiser-weight would be just as shit but you have to look at the bigger picture... More fighters from Light Heavyweight could fight at Cruiser-Weight.... Not only that but you would probably find that a lot of fighters from Super Middleweight would also (realistically) aspire to fight regularly at Cruiser-weight.

    So you can see that straight away the Cruiser-Weight division becomes a more illustrious division simply because it becomes more accessible from both above and below.

    So then obviously, logic dictates that the Super-Cruiser-weight division is afforded the same privileges when it has a melting pot of both the aforementioned pedigree of the division below and of course, fighters who currently fight at around 220lbs-230lbs who could easily make 210lbs if they wanted to.

    Current and Historical fighters (1980's onwards) such as:

    David Haye
    Michael Spinks
    Tomasz Adamek
    Antonio Tarver
    James Toney
    Alexander Povetkin
    Michael Moorer
    Denis Boytsov
    Evander Holyfield
    Timur Ibragimov
    Chris Byrd

    Now it's easy to see what kind of division the Super-Cruiser-weight could be, as long as it was properly made to accommodate all the other divisions around it (i.e lowering the Cruiserweight limit back to 184lbs) but also, there are some truly gifted fighters who could of really found a home there.... Michael Moorer, Chris Byrd, Tomasz Adamek & David Haye all could of been regarded as GREAT at that division because that is probably their best weight to fight at and obviously it would be great if all their opponents were the same weight right?

    So there you have it, I have officially changed my mind. I no longer want a Super Heavyweight division, I want a Super Cruiserweight division
    Last edited by Jimanuel Boogustus; 02-23-2011 at 06:00 PM.
    Hidden Content
    Original & Best: The Sugar Man

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Solution: Create a Superheavyweight Division FAST!

    great points on the super cruiser thing. i dont think guys who normally weigh-in at an in-shape 230 could make 210, however. tha's a huge drop for a guy that size.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1439
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Solution: Create a Superheavyweight Division FAST!

    Jimbo, again a Super-Cruiser division is pointless, as the likes of Haye would continue to fight at Heavy because of the glamour and financial aspect associated to the "Heavyweight Champion" name. Adding the word "Super" to it doesn't make either division sound more appealing, and the general public will once again be more confused at the distorted view of boxing.

    Remember, another division means countless more champions. Do we really need anymore?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2105
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Solution: Create a Superheavyweight Division FAST!

    Whether you call them Heavyweights or Super Heavyweights doesn't matter... the prestige will always be for the heaviest division... whatever name you give it.

    Creating a Super Cruiser weight or a Super heavyweight won't change the fact that the biggest guys are horrible and in my opinion just adds even more unnecessary weight classes.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Solution: Create a Superheavyweight Division FAST!

    imagine Willie Pep against Valuev

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,364
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1421
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Solution: Create a Superheavyweight Division FAST!

    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    great points on the super cruiser thing. i dont think guys who normally weigh-in at an in-shape 230 could make 210, however. tha's a huge drop for a guy that size.
    I disagree but that's not the point. It could be jiggled around in some way, to make it accessible...

    The main point is, that it brings all the top 5 divisions A LOT closer together.

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Jimbo, again a Super-Cruiser division is pointless, as the likes of Haye would continue to fight at Heavy because of the glamour and financial aspect associated to the "Heavyweight Champion" name. Adding the word "Super" to it doesn't make either division sound more appealing, and the general public will once again be more confused at the distorted view of boxing.

    Remember, another division means countless more champions. Do we really need anymore?
    I think this is a slightly short sighted response. (No offense buddy!)

    Firstly, Haye no doubt is a glory hunter but you forget that he fought at Cruiserweight for as long as he could. Do you honestly think he wouldn't of preferred to fight without a 200lbs limit for a while before snatching a belt off a Heavyweight? Of course he would, and look at the potential match up's there could of been...

    Secondly, I have absolutely no doubt that most of the boxers around the 225lbs mark would prefer to fight at Heavyweight but then I have no doubt that they would want to fight at 210ish either, especially if it meant picking up a strap from a division that could easily have the likes of Andre Ward, Chad Dawson, Tomasz Ademek & David Haye in it... That's a fantastic division right there!

    I'm of the thinking that if the weight classes are brought together and made more accessible so that fighters around the 200lbs are mixing in better company with fighters BOTH bigger and smaller then you start to then add more prestige to all the weight classes in and around it... Including most importantly the Heavyweight division.

    ***Edit***AdamGB and such like peoples....
    If you truly believe boxing has too many weight classes, then look to the bottom of the pile. 3 and 4 pound differentials... I agree, it's a joke.
    However, there's a real problem at the top of the scales that needs to be re-addressed IMHO, the gap needs to be bridged from 175 upwards.
    Last edited by Jimanuel Boogustus; 02-23-2011 at 01:24 PM.
    Hidden Content
    Original & Best: The Sugar Man

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3396
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Solution: Create a Superheavyweight Division FAST!

    In my opinion people are trying to look for a solution without there being a problem.

    The big freaks in the heavyweight division aren't even close to taking the division over. On the contrary they routinely get out boxed and beaten up by blown up cruisers.

    What giant heavyweights are ruining boxing exactly?

    The Klitchsko's are dominating boxing because they are by far the best boxers in the division. They turn up motivated, in shape, they have talent and ability and respect the sport enough to make sure they give 100% inside and outside the ring.

    Whether you find them boring or not they are worthy world champions. Surely the fact that the guys given the greatest shot at beating them are also some of the smallest fighters at the weight shows it's not about size.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2105
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Solution: Create a Superheavyweight Division FAST!

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    great points on the super cruiser thing. i dont think guys who normally weigh-in at an in-shape 230 could make 210, however. tha's a huge drop for a guy that size.
    I disagree but that's not the point. It could be jiggled around in some way, to make it accessible...

    The main point is, that it brings all the top 5 divisions A LOT closer together.

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Jimbo, again a Super-Cruiser division is pointless, as the likes of Haye would continue to fight at Heavy because of the glamour and financial aspect associated to the "Heavyweight Champion" name. Adding the word "Super" to it doesn't make either division sound more appealing, and the general public will once again be more confused at the distorted view of boxing.

    Remember, another division means countless more champions. Do we really need anymore?
    I think this is a slightly short sighted response. (No offense buddy!)

    Firstly, Haye no doubt is a glory hunter but you forget that he fought at Cruiserweight for as long as he could. Do you honestly think he wouldn't of preferred to fight without a 200lbs limit for a while before snatching a belt off a Heavyweight? Of course he would, and look at the potential match up's there could of been...

    Secondly, I have absolutely no doubt that most of the boxers around the 225lbs mark would prefer to fight at Heavyweight but then I have no doubt that they would want to fight at 210ish either, especially if it meant picking up a strap from a division that could easily have the likes of Andre Ward, Chad Dawson, Tomasz Ademek & David Haye in it... That's a fantastic division right there!

    I'm of the thinking that if the weight classes are brought together and made more accessible so that fighters around the 200lbs are mixing in better company with fighters BOTH bigger and smaller then you start to then add more prestige to all the weight classes in and around it... Including most importantly the Heavyweight division.

    ***Edit***AdamGB and such like peoples....
    If you truly believe boxing has too many weight classes, then look to the bottom of the pile. 3 and 4 pound differentials... I agree, it's a joke.
    However, there's a real problem at the top of the scales that needs to be re-addressed IMHO, the gap needs to be bridged from 175 upwards.
    I was actually going to say this... but didn't think it was 100% relevant, I have a hard time taking a lot of the lighter weights seriously when the difference is like 4 pounds.

    When they weight difference is the same as taking a crap/not taking a crap you have to worry.

    I know the argument here is - if those guys need 4 pounds then bigger guys shouldn't have to have differnces of 20,30,40 pounds.

    But I think Bilbo is right... Heavyweights reach a critical mass... the big ones tend to either be shite or plain out of shape. There simply isn't enough legitimate big men to need a whole new division.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,364
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1421
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Solution: Create a Superheavyweight Division FAST!

    Quote Originally Posted by AdamGB View Post
    Heavyweights reach a critical mass... the big ones tend to either be shite or plain out of shape. There simply isn't enough legitimate big men to need a whole new division.
    I agree... I really do but I just feel that the bridge between Light Heavyweight And Heavyweight isn't facilitated by Cruiserweight at all.

    Light Heavyweights don't hardly ever move upto Cruiserweight and Cruiserweights don't ever fight at Heavyweight.

    Of course Haye has kicked off a little trend but I bet that'll fizzle out as soon as Ademek gets his blocked knocked of by KitschkoTBA
    Hidden Content
    Original & Best: The Sugar Man

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Solution: Create a Superheavyweight Division FAST!

    "big" guys like Clay/Ali (for his time) look how big he looked against Folley, Cooper, Quarry, Patterson, Marciano, Frazier (who were the traditional heavy size)......then Ali starts getting equalled or dwarfed in size by the mid-70s by Norton, Wepner, Foreman, Bugner, Holmes, etc in weight and size......my point is that Ali used to weigh-in at what, 214 in his prime (not talking bout that young kid Clay who coulda made supermiddleweight practically!)....BUT guys who weighed in at 230 IN SHAPE----how could they realistically lose 20 pounds and be effective at 210? I think it would sap their strength/endurance----look what happnened to Bowe when he rematched Golota, he came in light as a feather and was shot by round 4. Can anyone imagine Lennox Lewis, Michael Grant, David Tua trying to make 210--------NFW!!!!!!!! I support a SuperHeavyweight Division. Calculate a boxer's SuperHeavy percentage like a baseball player's Slugging percentage. Height/reach/weight all averaged in.
    Last edited by brocktonblockbust; 02-24-2011 at 09:12 AM. Reason: typo

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,880
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1552
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Solution: Create a Superheavyweight Division FAST!

    I have not read most of this thread but would just like to say that a super HW division would totaly devalue boxing golden egg ie the HW title for ever.
    Balls

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,466
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1424
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: The Solution: Create a Superheavyweight Division FAST!

    Or the likes of Chris Arreola could one day wake up and realise that they should actually try and get into some sort of fighting condition.

    There isn't really a heavyweight out there who is conditioned enough to be able to use the full size of the ring at a good constant pace for anywhere near 12 rounds. Maybe David Haye is an exception, as he did this against Valuev, but he didn't throw many punches.

    Guys can make a good enough living by beating up other out of shape guys, and then losing a title shot against a Klitschko, before beating another bum and completing the full cycle again.
    http://instagram.com/jonnyboy_85_/

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Why Boxing is not seriously taken as weight loss solution?
    By Jimanuel Boogustus in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-29-2007, 05:12 AM
  2. Sure solution to lousy referee's!
    By landmine950 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-25-2006, 08:22 PM
  3. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-15-2006, 08:40 AM
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-15-2006, 01:48 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing