Vitali tribute

[No Contest]

Vitali is better than Wlad, what do you think?

[Dizaster]

Vitali is better than Wlad, what do you think?

I think so... I enjoy watching him fight more,,, like his character more etc... But Wlad is certainly not a poor mans Vitali and would give him a run for his money if they weren't brothers...

[Dark Lord Al]

would have been nice to see a prime Foreman vs Vitali a slugfest for sure.

[Master]

Actually that was very unimpressive.

[CutMeMick]

I think by the end of their respective careers both Wlad & Vitali will be considered top 10 HW all time.
I already consider them top 10 but I'm talking about general sensus...

[TitoFan]

I think by the end of their respective careers both Wlad & Vitali will be considered top 10 HW all time.
I already consider them top 10 but I'm talking about general sensus...

I think the general lack of worthy challengers is going to hurt both their legacies. Too bad they didn't come along during the days of Tyson, Lennox (though Vitali DID fight Lennox, but it was rather inconclusive), Holyfield, Bowe, etc. No fault of their own, and they probably would've done rather nicely against these opponents. But when you talk "top 10 all time", that's a LOT of ground to cover. And BOTH of them? I think it's kind of a stretch.

[El Kabong]

I think by the end of their respective careers both Wlad & Vitali will be considered top 10 HW all time.
I already consider them top 10 but I'm talking about general sensus...

I think the general lack of worthy challengers is going to hurt both their legacies. Too bad they didn't come along during the days of Tyson, Lennox (though Vitali DID fight Lennox, but it was rather inconclusive), Holyfield, Bowe, etc. No fault of their own, and they probably would've done rather nicely against these opponents. But when you talk "top 10 all time", that's a LOT of ground to cover. And BOTH of them? I think it's kind of a stretch.

The way the division is going I think people will be able to look back on this era and see that not only did the Klitschko's fight and beat the best heavyweights out there but their competition wasn't so horrible. I mean certainly there are some poor fighters on there but they had some dangerous fights....or fights that were considered dangerous at the time.

[Hulk]

I think by the end of their respective careers both Wlad & Vitali will be considered top 10 HW all time.
I already consider them top 10 but I'm talking about general sensus...

[erics44]

how many rounds has vitali lost in his career?

[DaxxKahn]

I think by the end of their respective careers both Wlad & Vitali will be considered top 10 HW all time.
I already consider them top 10 but I'm talking about general sensus...

The top of this era not in the ten of all time...It really has nothing to do with skill, wise either but comp wise....Sorry to disappoint and mind you I am a fan of both brothers perhaps Wlad a little more but .....To put them in the company of guys like Ali, Foreman, Frazier, Tyson, Holmes etc is a bit unfair to those guys....wins over guys Byrd, Peters, Brock do not compare to the guys that beat the other ATH hwts and reigned in such dominate eras or had such a special style to them they can not be mimicked

[CutMeMick]

This definition will appear in a boxing almanac when talking about the era of HW boxing in which they both participated...

The Klitschko Effect
[thuh-clee-itsh-co e-fekt] - A strange phenomenon in the Heavyweight division of boxing where a fighter previously considered world class and or top rated, is immediately demoted to the status of "bum" or "worthless" upon losing to Vitaly or Wladimir Klitschko. (ex. Byrd, Lamon, Hide, Arreola, Brock, Chambers, Chagaev, Mahone, Gomez, Johnson, Ibragimov & Peter)