Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 42 of 42

Thread: "Mediocre" heavies who could SMOKE David Haye

Share/Bookmark
  1. #31
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2472
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Mediocre" heavies who could SMOKE David Haye

    Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMick View Post
    Think u guys r selling Haye short
    ...
    The guy has proven he can bang n hes willing to fight anyone.
    I happn to like both Klits n Haye howvr I think Vitali owns him n hes got a shot at beating Wlad.
    that mirrors my views , Haye could KO Wlad early , however Vitali takes Hayes power and stops him inside 3

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Mediocre" heavies who could SMOKE David Haye

    i bet kimbo could toss on the gloves and drop some knowledge on haye.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    783
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1060
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Mediocre" heavies who could SMOKE David Haye

    In any other era both Wlad and Haye are mediocre heavies. Actually you can add Vitali to that list but i think it's laughable to create a thread like this hating on the current fighters as they are just doing what they can with what they have in front of them. Haye unified Cruiser and won a belt at heavy, Wlad near unified heavy and Vit has a long reign and is dominant at forty these three are the elite heavy fighters of our ERA.

    But let's not fool ourselves, I'm a Haye fan, your a Klit fan so rabid that you refuse to refer to David Haye using his name but the reality is a win over Haye is the crowning moment in either brothers career because despite having 25 fights is it? he is the biggest and most accomplished fighter they have fought bar Lewis. And Vit lost the Lewis fight by TKO.

    We have three mediocre heavyweight champions in fact I'd pick a prime Frank Bruno or Oliver Mcall to be the dominant champion if they were active fighters today.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,047
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5122
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Mediocre" heavies who could SMOKE David Haye

    Bruce Seldon......wait Stamina problems, fast hands, shakey chin, lack of top tier hvy competition...

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1507
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Mediocre" heavies who could SMOKE David Haye

    I don't even like Haye that much and I think he beats most of these guys, people are way under estimating his power and boxing ability. Besides Ali, Tyson, and Lewis and I have hard time seeing somebody as dynamically gifted in the modern heavyweight division. Sure Haye has his draw backs which make him not an ATG or anything, but don't underestimate him against run of the mill guys from the past, he would crush a lot of them.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1507
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Mediocre" heavies who could SMOKE David Haye

    Quote Originally Posted by piye View Post
    In any other era both Wlad and Haye are mediocre heavies. Actually you can add Vitali to that list but i think it's laughable to create a thread like this hating on the current fighters as they are just doing what they can with what they have in front of them. Haye unified Cruiser and won a belt at heavy, Wlad near unified heavy and Vit has a long reign and is dominant at forty these three are the elite heavy fighters of our ERA.

    But let's not fool ourselves, I'm a Haye fan, your a Klit fan so rabid that you refuse to refer to David Haye using his name but the reality is a win over Haye is the crowning moment in either brothers career because despite having 25 fights is it? he is the biggest and most accomplished fighter they have fought bar Lewis. And Vit lost the Lewis fight by TKO.

    We have three mediocre heavyweight champions in fact I'd pick a prime Frank Bruno or Oliver Mcall to be the dominant champion if they were active fighters today.
    Wlad is a mediocre heavyweight? Besides Lennox and his brother who would beat him more often than not?

    I would love to see Foreman get past that jab, or Frazier trying to figure out how to get on the inside. Tyson would be able to knock Wlad out a few of the times, but more often than not he would be contained and eventually ko'ed.

    Wlad has really good speed for his size, strength that only handful of heavyweights ever possessed, and the most dominant jab maybe the sport has ever seen. Larry Holmes had an amazing jab, but it didn't make opponents completely gun shy. THe difference is that Holmes has a snake like snappy jab that stunned opponents, and Wlad has a ramming jab that pummels opponents. HIs is like a right hand, and his makes 240 pound guys quit trying.


    Any of the top guys would have had a one punch type chance against Wlad, but he has made it so hard to hit him cleanly. He uses that jab, and he uses a decent cross on the outside then he falls on you when you get inside on him. You can't just counter over the jab because Wlad is quick and he comes forward behind it seamlessly with the punch, and he has a great feeling for range to go along with his height, so he doesn't throw the jab short, and if you are fast then he just waits a bit until you set your feet before he throws it. As he has gotten more confident it's become harder and harder for opponents to do anything against him.

    You can complain about the modern heavyweight division all you want, but it's really not that bad, and actually is far better than the one in the 80's. Where Larry Holmes and Tyson faced the same thing that they were vastly superior to the field around them.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    792
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1045
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Mediocre" heavies who could SMOKE David Haye

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Sad state of affairs these days when a Michael Spinks, an Ike Ibeabuchi, a Ken Norton, an Oliver McCall, a Gerry Cooney, a Buster Douglas would literally SMOKE David Haye. Guys like Jerry Quarry, Earnie Shavers, Jimmy Ellis, Mike Weaver, Tim Witherspoon would spread him across the ring like peanutbutter on hot toast.
    nah, ike maybe, witherspoon maybe
    so you feel Ken Norton wouldnt beat haye?? mike weaver? Shavers nailed ali, and Larry you feel he wouldnt catch haye with one big shot??

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Mediocre" heavies who could SMOKE David Haye

    Bruno
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  9. #39
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: "Mediocre" heavies who could SMOKE David Haye

    I think the WBA title holder could take out Norton. Ken Norton never handled power all that well. I think he could take out Golota fairly easy too and both of those guys were good fighters, good boxers.


    Shannon Briggs in his prime would have been difficult for him 6'4 225-230, fast hands, big power, decent durability. Tommy Morrison would have been a little dangerous for him. Ron Lyle, Donovan Ruddock, MAYBE Tex Cobb (only due to him durability...so the WBA title holder would have to fight like he did vs Carl Thompson to lose that fight), MAYBE Gerry Cooney. Tony Tucker would give him some trouble, Ray Mercer, Oliver McCall, Michael Dokes maybe, Chris Byrd, David Tua. Hell there are guys who are average that would give anyone trouble...I don't know if any of those fights are necessarily "easy" one way or another. And these heavyweights were only considered "mediocre" in their eras so that has to be taken into consideration.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    954
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Mediocre" heavies who could SMOKE David Haye

    Quote Originally Posted by NUCLEAR BULL View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Sad state of affairs these days when a Michael Spinks, an Ike Ibeabuchi, a Ken Norton, an Oliver McCall, a Gerry Cooney, a Buster Douglas would literally SMOKE David Haye. Guys like Jerry Quarry, Earnie Shavers, Jimmy Ellis, Mike Weaver, Tim Witherspoon would spread him across the ring like peanutbutter on hot toast.
    nah, ike maybe, witherspoon maybe
    so you feel Ken Norton wouldnt beat haye?? mike weaver? Shavers nailed ali, and Larry you feel he wouldnt catch haye with one big shot??
    Larry who?
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    954
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Mediocre" heavies who could SMOKE David Haye

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Bruno

    Bruno was the best heavyweight in history

    we are talking about mediocre heavies
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Mediocre" heavies who could SMOKE David Haye

    I say Mike Weaver and Tim Witherspoon SMOKE haye like a hawaiian joint.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 127
    Last Post: 04-24-2010, 09:20 AM
  2. Replies: 30
    Last Post: 06-23-2009, 02:34 AM
  3. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 04-28-2009, 11:33 PM
  4. Replies: 33
    Last Post: 01-01-2009, 11:10 AM
  5. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 11-17-2006, 08:29 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing