Overachievers in boxing

[Fenster]

I'm a bit confused by this thread too.

Form is temporary, class is permanent.

If a brilliant fighter pulls off an upset it is surely because of their already established brilliance, they haven't overachieved because they've already achieved enough to make them great?

[generalbulldog]

I'm a bit confused by this thread too.

Form is temporary, class is permanent.

If a brilliant fighter pulls off an upset it is surely because of their already established brilliance, they haven't overachieved because they've already achieved enough to make them great?

I guess we just have different definitions on the word "overachiever." Just like we both disagree on the word "elite" or "coward."

[Fenster]

I'm a bit confused by this thread too.

Form is temporary, class is permanent.

If a brilliant fighter pulls off an upset it is surely because of their already established brilliance, they haven't overachieved because they've already achieved enough to make them great?

I guess we just have different definitions on the word "overachiever." Just like we both disagree on the word "elite" or "coward."

I'm 100% certain that i've never used the word "coward" in more than 11,000 posts, unless merely repeating like now.

If, like me, you believe this word has no place in boxing then YES we fully agree, I don't actually know your definition or how it relates to fighters