P4P who was better: Nasem Hamed or Ricky Hatton?

[ono]

Hamed was fun while he boxed old men and second raters , he had become totally relient on his power when he boxed MAB , a combination of the wrong trainers and the fact he had fought to many second rate fighters , any of the durable greats would have beaten that Hamed.
His leaping angles he gave in early fights were all but gone , he became a one paced power puncher with no defence.

wtf this is making as much sense as your drinking style, which relies heavily upon finding the cheapest bilge water available and hyping it at luncheons as being top-notch brew.

Well if u dont understand the post maybe you could get a child to explain it to you , and then after a while u can talk to the adults of the forum.

to be honest man i dont really understand it

are you saying hamed was special and then went shit? or are you saying he was never that good coz he always fought old timers? by 'that hamed' do you mean just the one that fought mab or the one that fought old timers?

so if any of the durable greats could have beaten the hamed that fought old timers and all hamed ever fought was old timers then any of the durable greats could have beaten hamed at any time in his career and 'that hamed' was the only hamed that ever was.

But hang on..... you suggest he used to have skills coz the leaping angles that had gone must have been once there

nope sorry dont get it

It makes perfect sense.

Basically Big Gay Al is saying, that Naz did have talent, but he wasted his talented years fighting has-beens and overmatched fighters. He fought some good fighters, but by the time he faced MAB, he had transformed into a less effective fighter. His discipline was no longer there and he increasingly looked for the one big punch to end the fight.

A more youthful and disciplined Naz would have presented MAB with different problems. He might not have beaten him, but he would probably have been more competitive.

Easy peasy.