Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
Array
http://instagram.com/jonnyboy_85_/
Array
All i'd say is that Khan won the 6 rounds, no doubt, but he won them for me purely by way of activity, McCloskey made him look very very silly for alot of those rounds. This on the other hand has nothing to do with the fact that McCloskey was humble and factual. Khan on the other hand, is living in a borderline fantasy land. That he is way above McCloskey at World level, McCloskey made him look like it was his first day at the gym on some occasions during those 6 rounds. I really would love to see some compubox stats for thrown and landed by Khan, bet they are all over the place.
There's a few ounces of me that still like Khan for his ability, so I will tune in for the Bradley fight believeing it will be a cracker personally.
Last edited by TheMacMagician; 04-18-2011 at 06:54 PM.
Array
But that can happen in Boxing. Certain styles can make certain fighters look terrible. McCloskey has a terrible style for anybody to look good against. He leans so far back that you have to reach if you are going to land anything.
Khan forced it and that's why he looked so bad, but if he had have relaxed a bit more and picked his shots, he would have been criticised for being so cautious against such a mediocre opponent.
He's obviously way above McCloskey at world level. He fought like an absolute novice by your own admission, yet he was still 6-0 up.
http://instagram.com/jonnyboy_85_/
i kind if agree
i wanted dudey to win, but the fact is he didnt look anything like winning, yeah if it had have gone on he may have pulled something out of the bag, but (as much as it pains me to say) it would more likely have gone the way khan suggested it would
it was very unfortunate the way it was stopped but at the same time he didnt do anything that suggested he deserves a rematch
the ref and doctor should be banned and hopefully dudey will get a bigger fight on the back of it
Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks