I couldnt give a rats arse about titles - they don't mean shiht! The fact that their rankings are all so different shows how pathetic it is. If i'm talking to a mate who is a casual boxing fan and he starts saying that such and such a fighter must be better because he holds this or that title i quickly lose interest.

Ok sometime the top dog might have a belt or 2 but does it really matter? When Jones held loads belts at LHW we all knew he was the man but if i remember rightly most of the time he stuck to fighting his mandatories and didn't take many risks but he used the belts as an excuse.

As knowlegeable boxing fans on here we are more able to say who are the better fighters in the division are.

I'm not even getting into a discussion as to who should run boxing or what titles are the most legitimate. As long as there is a boatload of cash to be made the organisations are going nowhere not in our lifetime anyway.

I say the man who beats the man is now the man regardless of titles.