You can not use Manny/Shane as proof of how Manny/PBF will go

[BIG H]

Idiots will try and say that because Floyd couldn't knock Shane down... but manny could that this automatically means that manny is better.

That is a lot like saying that because Mosley stopped Margarito and knocked him down several times... whilst Margarito lasted the distance with Manny... that Shane is better than manny... obviously last night showed that this is not the case.

What I think it shows is that Manny is better fighting guys who are there, when they're on their bike he is not at his best. I think Floyd would capitalize on this and soften Manny up with some potshots... it'd be the typical Floyd... spending 3-4 rounds figuring a guy out and then pretty much shutting them out from there, Manny's phenomenal athleticism gives him a decent shout but I think Floyd handles him... too big a boxing brain.

This

[Mar]

You can never use fighter a and b to determine what would happen against fighter c. That is just silly. Dougless beat tyson who beat everyone before hand, so did that make dougless a killer or determine what he could do against anyone else cause he ko'ed the best ? No. And pac or floyd beating whoever has nothing to do with how'd they'd fare against each other. Ask salido how much common opponets helped juan ma.