You can not use Manny/Shane as proof of how Manny/PBF will go

**Pavlik** · 05-10-2011 02:03 AM

Originally Posted by Mars_ax

Manny vs Shane is proof of nothing, as for Pacquiao vs. Mayweather, if it ever actually happens, I favor Pacquiao for one simple reason: these 2 are evenly matched, however, as good as Mayweather is, there's no substitute for being in the ring regularly, his inactivity will be his downfall.

i stll think pbf can pot shot manny all night, but i also do think that if they trade shots Pac can seriously hurt him.

**Mars_ax** · 05-10-2011 02:46 AM

Originally Posted by Pavlik

Originally Posted by Mars_ax

Manny vs Shane is proof of nothing, as for Pacquiao vs. Mayweather, if it ever actually happens, I favor Pacquiao for one simple reason: these 2 are evenly matched, however, as good as Mayweather is, there's no substitute for being in the ring regularly, his inactivity will be his downfall.

i stll think pbf can pot shot manny all night, but i also do think that if they trade shots Pac can seriously hurt him.

Just saying, Pacquiao has been a very active fighter the last 5 years, Mayweather has not. So far PBF has been able to get away with being inactive because of his tremendous skills, but he has NEVER fought anyone on the same level as Pacquiao. Ring-rust will rear it's ugly head, and give Pacquiao, the edge he needs to win this fight.