Does Pavlik have enough tatoos?

[Mars_ax]

Pavlik seemed to def go a bit overboard with the tattoos. And they look like shit to be honest.

Cotto went overboard with tatts as well, but his look A LOT better than Pavlik's.

Pavlik now looks like white trash.

Agreed, Cotto must have had a better tattoo artist doing his, Pavlik's just make him look like a wino.

[Mar]

Looking close at them, the artwork isn't bad. Most get tat's for themselves, not whether we're going to like them or not. What made him look bad was that poor performance against a guy i had never even heard of. He could have come into the ring with a pink stripe down his back for all i care. In the ring performace is what matters most. That lifting of his right hand every time he lands a big right instead of throwing a follow up punch is what he really should be worried about.

[gest12645]

Cotto tats actually look really good. Pavlik's .. good artwork but too much. If you get more than 10 tattoos in less than a year , they seem meaningless usually, which ruins the purpose of a tattoo

[Hulk]

Cotto tats actually look really good. Pavlik's .. good artwork but too much. If you get more than 10 tattoos in less than a year , they seem meaningless usually, which ruins the purpose of a tattoo

10 ? Shit I'd say if you get more than 3 within a year then thats a lot.

Honestly, tattoos always look better on darker skin, and look trashy on white boys.

Of course, if your skin is too dark then you can't even see the damn tattoos. Such as on Tarver and James Toney. Both are covered in tatts but can you tell ?