WTF is PBF demanding w/ those Blood Tests???

[InTheNeutralCorner]

I WILL NEVER SAY CATAGORICALLY THAT SOMEONE IS CLEAN IF THEY HAVENT PASSED RANDOM BLOOD TESTING.

Give us some of the names of those who you think are categorically clean and what's your basis?

If Manny agreed to Floyd's drug test demand in the first negotiation, would that have been satisfactory to you? And if Manny tested negative in those, would you have categorically said that Manny is clean?

I haven't heard hornfinger's response to this but I would also like to hear the answers from mafiajoey and miles as well.

[Hornfinger]

I WILL NEVER SAY CATAGORICALLY THAT SOMEONE IS CLEAN IF THEY HAVENT PASSED RANDOM BLOOD TESTING.

Give us some of the names of those who you think are categorically clean and what's your basis?

If Manny agreed to Floyd's drug test demand in the first negotiation, would that have been satisfactory to you? And if Manny tested negative in those, would you have categorically said that Manny is clean?

I haven't heard hornfinger's response to this but I would also like to hear the answers from mafiajoey and miles as well.

Yep I would have been satisfifed that Manny was clean for that fight.

[InTheNeutralCorner]

I WILL NEVER SAY CATAGORICALLY THAT SOMEONE IS CLEAN IF THEY HAVENT PASSED RANDOM BLOOD TESTING.

Give us some of the names of those who you think are categorically clean and what's your basis?

If Manny agreed to Floyd's drug test demand in the first negotiation, would that have been satisfactory to you? And if Manny tested negative in those, would you have categorically said that Manny is clean?

I haven't heard hornfinger's response to this but I would also like to hear the answers from mafiajoey and miles as well.

Yep I would have been satisfifed that Manny was clean for that fight.

Thanks for the reply. See ..... I can be civil if the person I'm communicating with is civil.

I would respond to this after I see the reply from mafiajoey and miles, that is if they intend to reply?

[InTheNeutralCorner]

I WILL NEVER SAY CATAGORICALLY THAT SOMEONE IS CLEAN IF THEY HAVENT PASSED RANDOM BLOOD TESTING.

Give us some of the names of those who you think are categorically clean and what's your basis?

If Manny agreed to Floyd's drug test demand in the first negotiation, would that have been satisfactory to you? And if Manny tested negative in those, would you have categorically said that Manny is clean?

I haven't heard hornfinger's response to this but I would also like to hear the answers from mafiajoey and miles as well.

Yep I would have been satisfifed that Manny was clean for that fight.

Thanks for the reply. See ..... I can be civil if the person I'm communicating with is civil.

I would respond to this after I see the reply from mafiajoey and miles, that is if they intend to reply?

I don't think the two are going to respond to my question so I might as well reply to hornfinger's response.

If you are satisfied with whatever the outcome would have been of Floyd's drug test demand in the first negotiation, then you should still be satisfied with it even if it's in the second, third or tenth negotiation. Manny would have fulfilled this requirement in the second negotiation and it was Floyd's action (not wanting to fight and going on vacation) that prevented this from happening. While the burden of proof was with Manny in the first negotiation, it has shifted in the second since Manny agreed to the test.

And you really don't care as to the randomness of the test because you will be satisfied with Floyd's demand that has a 14 day cut-of period. This makes marbleheadmaui's above post make sense.

[Hornfinger]

I WILL NEVER SAY CATAGORICALLY THAT SOMEONE IS CLEAN IF THEY HAVENT PASSED RANDOM BLOOD TESTING.

Give us some of the names of those who you think are categorically clean and what's your basis?

If Manny agreed to Floyd's drug test demand in the first negotiation, would that have been satisfactory to you? And if Manny tested negative in those, would you have categorically said that Manny is clean?

I haven't heard hornfinger's response to this but I would also like to hear the answers from mafiajoey and miles as well.

Yep I would have been satisfifed that Manny was clean for that fight.

Thanks for the reply. See ..... I can be civil if the person I'm communicating with is civil.

I would respond to this after I see the reply from mafiajoey and miles, that is if they intend to reply?

I don't think the two are going to respond to my question so I might as well reply to hornfinger's response.

If you are satisfied with whatever the outcome would have been of Floyd's drug test demand in the first negotiation, then you should still be satisfied with it even if it's in the second, third or tenth negotiation. Manny would have fulfilled this requirement in the second negotiation and it was Floyd's action (not wanting to fight and going on vacation) that prevented this from happening. While the burden of proof was with Manny in the first negotiation, it has shifted in the second since Manny agreed to the test.

And you really don't care as to the randomness of the test because you will be satisfied with Floyd's demand that has a 14 day cut-of period. This makes marbleheadmaui's above post make sense.

Not nessasarily. If he knows 2-3 months before a training camp that he could be tested within that period he can clean out his body. So yes I believe he'd be clean for that fight.

I still believe part of the negotiation break down the first time could have been because pac and his team didn't think they'd have enough time to clean the shit out of his system before the testing period commenced.

I wouldn't have catagorically said he was clean. I would have said he was clean for THAT fight.

Shane and floyd were clean for THAT fight.

[InTheNeutralCorner]

i will never say catagorically that someone is clean if they havent passed random blood testing.

give us some of the names of those who you think are categorically clean and what's your basis?

if manny agreed to floyd's drug test demand in the first negotiation, would that have been satisfactory to you? And if manny tested negative in those, would you have categorically said that manny is clean?

i haven't heard hornfinger's response to this but i would also like to hear the answers from mafiajoey and miles as well.

yep i would have been satisfifed that manny was clean for that fight.

thanks for the reply. See ..... I can be civil if the person i'm communicating with is civil.

I would respond to this after i see the reply from mafiajoey and miles, that is if they intend to reply?

i don't think the two are going to respond to my question so i might as well reply to hornfinger's response.

If you are satisfied with whatever the outcome would have been of floyd's drug test demand in the first negotiation, then you should still be satisfied with it even if it's in the second, third or tenth negotiation. Manny would have fulfilled this requirement in the second negotiation and it was floyd's action (not wanting to fight and going on vacation) that prevented this from happening. While the burden of proof was with manny in the first negotiation, it has shifted in the second since manny agreed to the test.

And you really don't care as to the randomness of the test because you will be satisfied with floyd's demand that has a 14 day cut-of period. This makes marbleheadmaui's above post make sense.

not nessasarily. If he knows 2-3 months before a training camp that he could be tested within that period he can clean out his body. So yes i believe he'd be clean for that fight.
but isn't that what matters so that floyd will not have an excuse not to fight manny?

i still believe part of the negotiation break down the first time could have been because pac and his team didn't think they'd have enough time to clean the shit out of his system before the testing period commenced.
maybe, and your doubt seems reasonable.

i wouldn't have catagorically said he was clean. I would have said he was clean for that fight.
agree. But the fact that that testing did not happen is because of floyd's actions hence the burden of proof does not lie with manny anymore.

shane and floyd were clean for that fight.
it's just unfortunate that you call yourself a boxing fan yet you think shane and floyd has the only clean fight.

[:::PSL:::]

Joeygotfingered,

I'm still waiting for that "Pac on PEDs" proof.

Where the fuck is it?

[Hornfinger]

i will never say catagorically that someone is clean if they havent passed random blood testing.

give us some of the names of those who you think are categorically clean and what's your basis?

if manny agreed to floyd's drug test demand in the first negotiation, would that have been satisfactory to you? And if manny tested negative in those, would you have categorically said that manny is clean?

i haven't heard hornfinger's response to this but i would also like to hear the answers from mafiajoey and miles as well.

yep i would have been satisfifed that manny was clean for that fight.

thanks for the reply. See ..... I can be civil if the person i'm communicating with is civil.

I would respond to this after i see the reply from mafiajoey and miles, that is if they intend to reply?

i don't think the two are going to respond to my question so i might as well reply to hornfinger's response.

If you are satisfied with whatever the outcome would have been of floyd's drug test demand in the first negotiation, then you should still be satisfied with it even if it's in the second, third or tenth negotiation. Manny would have fulfilled this requirement in the second negotiation and it was floyd's action (not wanting to fight and going on vacation) that prevented this from happening. While the burden of proof was with manny in the first negotiation, it has shifted in the second since manny agreed to the test.

And you really don't care as to the randomness of the test because you will be satisfied with floyd's demand that has a 14 day cut-of period. This makes marbleheadmaui's above post make sense.

not nessasarily. If he knows 2-3 months before a training camp that he could be tested within that period he can clean out his body. So yes i believe he'd be clean for that fight.
but isn't that what matters so that floyd will not have an excuse not to fight manny?

i still believe part of the negotiation break down the first time could have been because pac and his team didn't think they'd have enough time to clean the shit out of his system before the testing period commenced.
maybe, and your doubt seems reasonable.

i wouldn't have catagorically said he was clean. I would have said he was clean for that fight.
agree. But the fact that that testing did not happen is because of floyd's actions hence the burden of proof does not lie with manny anymore.

shane and floyd were clean for that fight.
it's just unfortunate that you call yourself a boxing fan yet you think shane and floyd has the only clean fight.

All of your replies are irrelevent retarded shite, apart from the last part which just takes it to a new level because it makes no sence.

I am a boxing fan because I believe in fair and even contests. I believe that that is what is best for the sport. Tell me another contest that had olympic style random testing before it and I'll agree it was a clean fight.

[marbleheadmaui]

I WILL NEVER SAY CATAGORICALLY THAT SOMEONE IS CLEAN IF THEY HAVENT PASSED RANDOM BLOOD TESTING.

Give us some of the names of those who you think are categorically clean and what's your basis?

If Manny agreed to Floyd's drug test demand in the first negotiation, would that have been satisfactory to you? And if Manny tested negative in those, would you have categorically said that Manny is clean?

I haven't heard hornfinger's response to this but I would also like to hear the answers from mafiajoey and miles as well.

Yep I would have been satisfifed that Manny was clean for that fight.

And THAT answer demonstrates just how clueless you are about the ability of ther current testing regimes to actually catch the leading edge cheaters.

[mafiajoey]

I WILL NEVER SAY CATAGORICALLY THAT SOMEONE IS CLEAN IF THEY HAVENT PASSED RANDOM BLOOD TESTING.

Give us some of the names of those who you think are categorically clean and what's your basis?

If Manny agreed to Floyd's drug test demand in the first negotiation, would that have been satisfactory to you? And if Manny tested negative in those, would you have categorically said that Manny is clean?

I haven't heard hornfinger's response to this but I would also like to hear the answers from mafiajoey and miles as well.

If Manny agreed to test be it 1st, 2nd, or 50th negotiation...and we had proof he agreed. As in he signed his part of the contract....then I am satisfied. I'm not 100% convinced he is on anything. I never thought he was. I never, ever thought he was until he came with the worst excuse after excuse and he made himself look guilty by opening his mouth. He should just call Floyd out and send over "signed paperwork" and if Floyd bullshits then I say fuck Floyd for being a bitch. But above I referenced "signed paperwork" cause some people here actually think cause Manny, Roach or Bob say something that they mean it. Sure they will say Manny agreed or this or that while they are negotiation his next victim before fighting the one in front of him.


It was the excuses that killed me. It was the B.S. Manny said....for the love of God if he agreed and took the test and fought Floyd regardless of outcome I would be happy.


I also think that after the first negotiation Pac and fans and everyone on his balls have done everything possible to "Claim" they agreed the second time. Proof? And now they just ride out the "Blame Floyd" roller coaster and Manny keeps avoiding the test. So that's why I have doubt. Not saying he is on something 100% but he just runs and even when he so called agrees.......it's only verified by him, Roach and Arum. They always say this shit. And they keep lining up fight after fight before fights are signed to avoid the test. But Pac fans don't want to believe it. Just like I would like to think Floyd isn't ducking Manny and I don't. But harsh reality is if Manny signs to test "I want Proof" then Floyd is a ducker and I will accept it. But the logic of a Pac fan is that they "worship" him so he could do no wrong. See us Flomos as you call us don't actually like Floyd so we are open to both sides of the story. Pac fans are not. He is god therefore he is clean.

[InTheNeutralCorner]

If Manny agreed to test be it 1st, 2nd, or 50th negotiation...and we had proof he agreed. As in he signed his part of the contract....then I am satisfied. I'm not 100% convinced he is on anything. I never thought he was. I never, ever thought he was until he came with the worst excuse after excuse and he made himself look guilty by opening his mouth. He should just call Floyd out and send over "signed paperwork" and if Floyd bullshits then I say fuck Floyd for being a bitch. But above I referenced "signed paperwork" cause some people here actually think cause Manny, Roach or Bob say something that they mean it. Sure they will say Manny agreed or this or that while they are negotiation his next victim before fighting the one in front of him.

If Manny agress to the drug test, the burden of proof shifts to the opposing boxer. How many times do I have to say this?
There can not be a "signed paperwork" if Floyd's team even denies that the second negotiation took place.

It was the excuses that killed me. It was the B.S. Manny said....for the love of God if he agreed and took the test and fought Floyd regardless of outcome I would be happy.

Both parties came up with excuses in the first negotiation. Some think that the blood test demand was Floyd's excuse to avoid the fight and Manny did not call in Floyd's bluff. When Manny agreed in the second negotiation, Floyd's refusal appear to give credibility to the suspicion that he was indeed avoiding Manny.

I also think that after the first negotiation Pac and fans and everyone on his balls have done everything possible to "Claim" they agreed the second time. Proof? And now they just ride out the "Blame Floyd" roller coaster and Manny keeps avoiding the test. So that's why I have doubt. Not saying he is on something 100% but he just runs and even when he so called agrees.......it's only verified by him, Roach and Arum. They always say this shit. And they keep lining up fight after fight before fights are signed to avoid the test. But Pac fans don't want to believe it. Just like I would like to think Floyd isn't ducking Manny and I don't. But harsh reality is if Manny signs to test "I want Proof" then Floyd is a ducker and I will accept it. But the logic of a Pac fan is that they "worship" him so he could do no wrong. See us Flomos as you call us don't actually like Floyd so we are open to both sides of the story. Pac fans are not. He is god therefore he is clean.

Manny Pacquiao Agrees To Blood Test | The Daily Tribute

Pacquiao Agrees to Drug Testing to Fight Mayweather | Testing It Up – Drug & Health Testing News – Test Country Blog

BBC Sport - Manny Pacquiao agrees to 14-day blood-testing limit

Pacquiao willing to take random dope test | The Manila Bulletin Newspaper Online

Pacquiao agrees to the Olympic-style random drug test | onFuss.com

Manny Pacquiao agrees to undergo blood tests, but Floyd Mayweather has new... - Bloody Elbow

Report: Manny Pacquiao Agrees to Floyd Mayweather Jr.'s Drug-Testing Demands - Manny Pacquiao - NESN.com

Pacman Agrees to Drug Test

Boxing: Pacquiao agrees to blood tests for fight with Mayweather - Others, More Sports - The Independent

Yes, team Pacquiao claimed they agreed to the drug test. It's up to team Mayweather to prove that they're bluffing.

[InTheNeutralCorner]

We're going in circles. Let's give this thread a rest.

[Hornfinger]

We're going in circles. Let's give this thread a rest.

I agree it's best you give it a rest because you're getting slaughtered with every new post.

[:::PSL:::]

We're going in circles. Let's give this thread a rest.

I agree it's best you give it a rest because you're getting slaughtered with every new post.

He's getting slaughtered with what?...

[InTheNeutralCorner]

We're going in circles. Let's give this thread a rest.

I agree it's best you give it a rest because you're getting slaughtered with every new post.

He's getting slaughtered with what?...

I think hornfinger is trying to be a comedian.