Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 85

Thread: Bernard is historically greater than Manny or Floyd

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,826
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1217
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bernard is historically greater than Manny or Floyd

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    Ok lest put it this way who has ever moved up from any weightclass to Heavy and would be considered to be a top 10 atg heavweight champion of all time. There as been one and that is Evander Holyfeild so over the course of how long this sport has been around one guy been able to move up Heavy and be a top 10 I think that is why it is harder to move up so many weight classes when you are in higher weights and become great in them.

    There are 4 Divisions from 105 lbs to 118lbs. That is just 13 lbs. but i dont think there is anyone who has won legitimate titles ( Yeah even Alphabet World titles ) from 105 to 118.

    Arce recently won the WBO 122lbs title but his title at 112 were all interim's.


    1 or 2 lbs means a lot to small fighters. Moving up is just as hard to little guys compared to big guys.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1113
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bernard is historically greater than Manny or Floyd

    Lang i have to disagree a bit it is hard as shit to move up in weight when you are 160 and up i would say. And like i said before it is almost unheard of to move up to heavyweight and be a great at that division.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1113
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bernard is historically greater than Manny or Floyd

    For example Hagler was a great but no way in hell he was going to win against Spinks at 175. Spinks and Foster were the top lhw of all time look what happen to them at Heavyweight.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,826
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1217
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bernard is historically greater than Manny or Floyd

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    For example Hagler was a great but no way in hell he was going to win against Spinks at 175. Spinks and Foster were the top lhw of all time look what happen to them at Heavyweight.
    Well that is true.

    but that also applies to the little dudes. Lopez was a beast but he did not even fought at 112.


    Roy for example started at 154 and won an alphabet at heavyweight. That is 5 Divisions. at least it has been done. while i dont know if there's anybody that started at 105 and later won a 122 lbs alphabet.

    Many other middleweights like Toney has climbed and won at heavyweight in comparison the little guys are not as successful w/c indicate that moving up is not also easily done at the lower weights.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1113
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bernard is historically greater than Manny or Floyd

    Yea but i think alot of the lower weights have not been around as long. Not to mention Pac was 16 years of age kinda help he grow as he got older i mean still pretty amazing but pac was 16 when he started. Think about your self at 16 and how you are now i am a good 20 pounds heavier then i was at 16.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    HARLEM
    Posts
    2,691
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1142
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bernard is historically greater than Manny or Floyd

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    Yea but i think alot of the lower weights have not been around as long. Not to mention Pac was 16 years of age kinda help he grow as he got older i mean still pretty amazing but pac was 16 when he started. Think about your self at 16 and how you are now i am a good 20 pounds heavier then i was at 16.
    Yep, people also forgot that PBF fought at 108 as a 16 year old amateur.
    "Sixty forty I kicks yo' ass, Sixty forty I tears yo' ass up" - Roy Jones

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dawson Springs, KY
    Posts
    8,430
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1452
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bernard is historically greater than Manny or Floyd

    Quote Originally Posted by JonesJrMayweather View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    Yea but i think alot of the lower weights have not been around as long. Not to mention Pac was 16 years of age kinda help he grow as he got older i mean still pretty amazing but pac was 16 when he started. Think about your self at 16 and how you are now i am a good 20 pounds heavier then i was at 16.
    Yep, people also forgot that PBF fought at 108 as a 16 year old amateur.
    People also forgot he's got 6 losses fighting as amateur.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    969
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bernard is historically greater than Manny or Floyd

    BTW, 3 pounds is a lot to the little guys in regards to body mass percentage as people have stated. Take Ricardo Lopez for instance, someone here said it would have been easy for Lopez to become a champ from 105 to 118, that may be 5 weight classes but only 13 pounds as they say. They say 13 pounds is nothing but yet if you look at boxing history how many 4 or 5 weight champs at the lower weights? Since it's only a few pounds as they say and looks real easy because the weights are separated by 3 or 4 pounds?

    So if it's real easy to do. Name me the guys that have won lineal titles or alphabet titles in 4 or 5 weight divisions 130 and below? We'll use 130 as the cutoff weight. I would like to hear the names if it's real easy. So it should be 30 or 40 guys in boxing history that has done it right? I mean it's just 3 or 4 measly pounds separating those divisions?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1113
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bernard is historically greater than Manny or Floyd

    Well also how old is the lower weight classes compared to higher ones not to mention the talent pool is pretty slim as well when you look at the lower weight class roster.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    969
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bernard is historically greater than Manny or Floyd

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    Well also how old is the lower weight classes compared to higher ones not to mention the talent pool is pretty slim as well when you look at the lower weight class roster.
    What does being how old matter? The higher weight classes has 140, 154, 168, and 200 that are pretty new. And historically the 140 pound and 200 pound division has the been the weakest divisions in boxing history.

    The point being if 3 or 4 pounds separating the lower weight classes is insignificant and isn't seem as that big of a hurdle compared to the higher weight classes, then there would be 30 to 40 multiple 3 or 4 weight division champions. But guess what? There isn't. Those 3 or 4 pounds is significant for the lower weight fighters because of their physiology. If it wasn't a big deal a great fighter like Ricardo Lopez would have fought and dominated through 3 or 4 of the lower weight divisions like it's nothing, but he couldn't. It would have been only 10 pounds for Ricardo Lopez to fight in 4 divisions, but because of the lower weight fighter's physiology, it's a big hurdle.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 17
    Last Post: 10-10-2010, 10:08 AM
  2. Pernell Whitaker or Manny Pacqioau greater resume?
    By Motor City Cobra in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 06-18-2009, 06:13 AM
  3. Pernell Whitaker or Manny Pacqioau greater resume?
    By Motor City Cobra in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-11-2009, 07:14 PM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-07-2009, 06:35 AM
  5. How good is Mayweather historically?
    By a harmful of swallows in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 11-15-2006, 05:10 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing