Quote Originally Posted by Memphis View Post
Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Memphis View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Mark TKO View Post
I just think Lewis could have done what Douglas did a couple of years earlier thats all.

But a Tyson KO inside of 30 seconds wouldnt surprise me in the slightest.
Me too, although Lewis would have controlled him rather than battered him like a man possesed.
Lewis couldnt "control" Mercer, who hadno where near the speed or skill of Tyson. He was also alot easier to hit. This is the same Mercer that Holmes beat
Your right, I've changed my mind due to the fact that you keep repeating the same fucking thing over and over again.
Inception; it works!





I agree with GeneralBulldog about Holyfield. Having thought about it, I think he beats Tyson 7/10 at any point of their respective careers.

But in regards to Lewis, I have to call it 50/50.

Then again I already make an exception for Tyson. It's kinda hard to explain but obviously Lewis was more consistent where as Tyson was a short fuse so true odds are Lewis is more likely the winner but if were talking prime4prime, although Tyson's physical peak barely lasted a summer, that was still his prime and so at that point I'm more inclined to say 50/50 if not 60/40 Tyson.

I'm not making any sense, I literately have no idea?!