
Originally Posted by
JazMerkin

Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita

Originally Posted by
JazMerkin

Originally Posted by
FinitoElDinamita
So Murray seems to be the clear favorite according to most of you.. But why.. Is it because you guys believe the Katsidis loss took alot out of Mitchell physically or mentally?? Or is it because you guys think Murray is much better?
Charlie
Slang term for
Cocaine - a white crystalline alkaloid derived from coca plants. Sometimes known as "Rich Man's
Speed" - strong eurphoric/stimulant effects.
Does this explain my post any better?
Well I wouldnt know any slang terms since I never did drugs but many coke feen fighters have kicked ass in the ring. Drugs may catch up faster to older fighters but Mitchell is still a fresh thundercat and it might not be that much of an issue for him..
You don't have to do coke to know the terms? Didn't they have names for it in the Wah Ching warz?
Mitchell ain't Pernell Whitaker. Coke is not a good part of the training regime. Mitchell is not so good that he can fight without being completely focused, I saw that up close in the Katsidis fight.
Out here in LA, we dont use no terms like CHARLIE.... sounds more like a British thing..
He dont have to be no Whitaker to beat John Murray. What has Murray done that makes him so dangerous?
Mitchell is more proven as a pro and neither guy holds much advantage over the other.. It's a nice matchup..
Bookmarks