I kind of disagree here; Over 240 fights, the Pep had a Ko ratio of only 26.97%, so let's say 27% (according to Boxrec). I don't think that we can state that 27% is great by any mean. I disagree also with the idea that we have to compare the title fights from the non title fights. We have to consider the whole of his career. Vitali Klitschko has a ko ratio of over 97%, title or not title, that says how much the guy can bang. But when overall, the best you can do is 27%, I hardly see how it could indicate any "pop" at all in the punches.
Also, consider this: among his KOs percentage, many of those did happen against questionable opponents that have been knocked out many times already and who did have quite glass jaw. a few examples:
Ray Coleman: 10-21 knocked out 12 times
Sergio Musquiz: 1-7 knocked out 5 times
Tommy Haden: 12-12 knocked out 4 times
Willy Little: 9-7 knocked out 5 times
Manny Castro: 5-9 knocked out 3 times
Don't get me wrong, the Pep is my all time favorite boxer, he had speed, movement and a defense that only ghosts to possess (and no, i don't mean Pavilk), but in term of power, he was quite questionable. Sure, some other boxers have even less power (which says a lot) but PEp with his low KO ratio still belongs to the category of the guys who did lack in power but who could compensate with all his other skills.
NOt the most feathered fisted boxer ever but definitely the most successful and most legendary pillow knuckles of all time. I also remember an interview with Bert Sugar in which he said that Pep was one of the greatest of all time but could not be considered the greatest because, among other things, of his lack of power. Will try ot find it back.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 




Reply With Quote

Bookmarks