Quote Originally Posted by skel1983
Quote Originally Posted by bilbo
Personally I think they are both overratted. Haye good boxer, big puncher, no chin and stamina issues.
Enzo, big puncher, good chin and plenty of stamina, but zero skills.

If they could morph into one fighter, the result would be a world beater but as they are they are both beatable.

In fact I'd fancy Calzaghe or B Hop to be able to go up to 185 lb and beat them both.
Mate you being serious?

I think they would both be knocked out. These men are to big for Calzaghe and Hopkins

I'm totally serious, James Toney is naturally a middleweight and he's been in with bigger guys with bigger punches than both Enzo and Haye, plus he's taking on the biggest puncher of them all right now Sam Peter in September.

Roy Jones another middleweight, naturally probably smaller than Calzaghe and Hopkins went up to heavyweight and beat John Ruiz.

Calzaghe walks around at over 185lbs and I'm looking at Hopkins last time out against Tarver, he could easily fill out to be a 185 lb. He looks like Holyfield did.

Power isn't squat if you can't land and belive me there is no way in hell Enzo Macc is landing with anything against Hopkins or Calzaghe, even if the fight went 50 rounds. He'll just be a punchbag for 12 rounds. Good chin means he'll soak up the pressure but he would lose lopsided decisions to both.

David Haye can only go 6 rounds at a strong pace, and would be exhuasted by then against someone like Calzaghe. Hopkins would nail in the later rounds also. I would be confident of both Hopkins and Calzaghe stopping Haye inside the distance.

Size isn't that much a factor. Tommy Hearns used to fight at welterweight but now is still campaigning at light heavy. Ray Leonard won titles from welter weight up to light heavy weight.

I reckon Calzaghe and Hopkins could both fight at 185lbs.