Re: Gatti v. Hatton

Originally Posted by
The Game

Originally Posted by
killersheep

Originally Posted by
The Game
Gatti has only fought once at WW hasn't he?? That damgaard dude? I could be wrong but I'm sure he does not have that much more experience than Hatton and the reach advantage is insignificant when we speak about Gatti because he does not make the most of it,nearly every fight he is in is a war. Also,to your other point,you can see the difference in power between 140 and 147 with Collazo hurting Hatton so I do believe Luis to be stronger than Gatti.
Do not misunderstand me,Gatti-Hatton,great fight but in no way shape or form do I think Gatti would win and also,just to add,I think Baldomir will beat Gatti too.
Gatti has fought 3 times at WW
Damgaard
de la Hoya
Jakubrowski
And for power v. power
Collazo 26 wins - 12 KOs = 46.1% KO rate
Gatti 40 wins - 31 KOs = 77.5% KO rate
Hatton 41 wins - 30 KOs = 73.1% KO rate
Gatti of course lost to de la Hoya, but in his other 2 WW bouts, he won by TKO 10th round and TKO 2nd round
Collazo is NOT a power puncher, he is a boxer........
That ratio thing is impressive but has no relevance,Collazo is naturally bigger and stronger,Gatti had more ko's at lower weight classes.
Thanks LG and remember to keep checking the thread bro!
The ratio thing is relavent, mostly for the following reason.....................
It shows that Collazo focuses on setting up combo's for point victories, as opposed to Gatti who is more focused on power shots, I will say it again, I think Hatton would win, but I also think Gatti would hurt Hatton more than Collazo...
I can honestly say at any rate this is one of the top 5 fights I'd like to see I think both fighters would get their chins tested to the fullest!! and a
because I am enjoying this debate
For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.
Bookmarks