Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 80

Thread: Could Hearns have ever beaten Hagler?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,130
    Mentioned
    503 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Could Hearns have ever beaten Hagler?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post
    I have been thinking about this fight and what If...
    Quote Originally Posted by Tam Seddon View Post

    The fight had taken place when it was originally suppose to, not with so many cancellations and so many fights in between.

    If Hearns didn't have such a dodgy hand, how much would this have effected him if he didn't have one? It was definatly a factor in the war.

    Would Hagler have been so aggressive if he hadn't been cut so early on? Would Hagler have fought at such a high pace?

    Or was Hagler just too strong for Hearns at middleweight and even with Hearns being fully fit for the fight would he have eventually stopped him?

    Hearns should definatly boxed a lot more in this fight and I'm thinking if Hearns offered a more of a disaplined fight would he have beaten Hagler?

    It was such a memorable contest though, I've been doing a lot of research on Hearns recentley and I do feel he had the tools to beat Hagler that night IMO.
    People say Hearns should have boxed more but I'm not sure even if Hearns would have boxed behind his jab. I don't think that would have been enough. I think Hagler would have just walked right through him. I don't think Hearns is a good enough boxer to walk away with a UD aganist Hagler. Remember one of the greatest boxers of all time (Sugar Ray Leonard) just about beat Hagler to a split decision and that was against and a way over confident and under-trained hagler.

    Hearns was facing a highly motivated Hagler who was ready for war. Who didn't under-estimate Hearns as he did with SRL. There is no way Hearns could have jab and moved for 12 rounds. Hagler would have caught up with him and chopped him down. Maybe I'm under-estimating Hearns boxing skills but that's how I see it.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,190
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1114
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Could Hearns have ever beaten Hagler?

    No! hagler was a naural middleweight who fought every tough S.O.B. on the east coast and was conditioned by wars with tally lanky sluggers with a punch. The key word is that Marvin was a natural middleweight and Tommy spent too much time as a welter and should have moved up years before he did.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    5,788
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1238
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Could Hearns have ever beaten Hagler?

    If John Mugabi, young and brimming with power of a natural middleweight can't knock out an older past his prime Hagler, I have a hard time thinking that Hearns would have ever stopped Hagler. Hagler was a very good boxer, more than people will give him credit, he would have eventually caught up to Hearns and has shown he had the power to stop him. So Hearns couldn't stop Hagler but Hagler could stop Hearns, and Hearns would have to fight super cautious behind the jab for 12 rounds but Hagler would have found a way inside it eventually and there's no way Hearns would have beat him with just that for an entire 12 rounds, that plus the fact Hearns had nothing to move Hagler backwards really, once Hagler took Hearns perfect right hand on the button and kept coming, the fight was over, cause Hearns wasn't going to win a decision with Hagler mauling him the whole fight.
    Life is still worth while If You Just Smile - MJ

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,829
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    827
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Could Hearns have ever beaten Hagler?

    Quote Originally Posted by Majesty View Post
    If John Mugabi, young and brimming with power of a natural middleweight can't knock out an older past his prime Hagler, I have a hard time thinking that Hearns would have ever stopped Hagler. Hagler was a very good boxer, more than people will give him credit, he would have eventually caught up to Hearns and has shown he had the power to stop him. So Hearns couldn't stop Hagler but Hagler could stop Hearns, and Hearns would have to fight super cautious behind the jab for 12 rounds but Hagler would have found a way inside it eventually and there's no way Hearns would have beat him with just that for an entire 12 rounds, that plus the fact Hearns had nothing to move Hagler backwards really, once Hagler took Hearns perfect right hand on the button and kept coming, the fight was over, cause Hearns wasn't going to win a decision with Hagler mauling him the whole fight.
    Great point on the Beast. He hit Marvin clean a bunch of times and Marvin, well, he just kept on coming.
    Hidden Content Bring me the best and I will knock them out-Alexis Arguello
    I'm not God, but I am something similar-Robert Duran

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    67,035
    Mentioned
    1706 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3144
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Could Hearns have ever beaten Hagler?

    Yes, Hearns had the tools and skills to stay away from Hagler and possibly win on points. He did injure his hand in the fight and his legs were weak as well. So he could do it and he always wanted a return as he felt he could beat Hagler. He did unofficially beat Leonard.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,320
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    822
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Could Hearns have ever beaten Hagler?

    Tommy would NEVER ever beat MMH at middleweight not in a million years , as great as the Hitman was he landed his best punches before he damaged his hand , and Hagler just walked threw them ,both were in there prime at the time,Hagler always would have to much ammo against Tommy ,although Hearns should have got the decision over Sugar ray , they were both past there best by then ,there was only one man who beat Leonard in his prime

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Kent, England
    Posts
    989
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    839
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Could Hearns have ever beaten Hagler?

    Just watched the fight again after reading this thread and WOW! that first round never gets boring

    Hearns had his hands very low a lot of the time and was getting caught by silly shots even at long range. He was constantly on the move but he was never going to be able to keep Hagler off him for the entire fight fighting like that. Hearns was doing well at times landing that long jab maybe if he had have planted his feet and threw 2s,3s, and 4s more often he might have deterred Hagler very slightly or at least been able to slow the pace of the fight down and the tide might have started to turn in his favour the more tired Hagler became with the way he was fighting.

    Hearns dodging some of those blows in the corner 1st round and still trying to fight his way out was pretty special. Hagler was a monster!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    27
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Could Hearns have ever beaten Hagler?

    Tommy beats Marvin in a return match. Hagler was taylor made for Hearns. Slow hands would have killed marvin in a return fight. If they box at all Tommy knocks Marvin down with combinations. The reason Marvin didnt get knocked out in the first fight is that he always had his neck in the "flexed position" waging war. In a return fight Marvin would be forced to box Hearns thus exposing his chin and relaxing his neck resulting in FLASH KNOCKDOWN's. Marvin was very lucky Hearns fought him the way he did in 1985. Hearns biggest problem is he had a bad trainer/manager. Both Hagler and Leonard's trainer out managed Hearns trainer. Had Hearns had Dundee as his trainer he beats everyone. Hearns was the best boxer, had the most FLASH power, and had the best footwoork of all his opponents. Hagler gets sliced up and stopped in a return match IMO
    Hearns and Hagler wasnt a boxing match it was a street fight. Hearns has it all over Hagler from a boxing prospective. Not even close. Yes Marvin was stronger

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Hearns/Hagler trash talk.
    By Markusdarkus in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-17-2008, 03:41 PM
  2. Who had best fights Hagler or Hearns
    By nigel2smooth79 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-03-2007, 08:49 AM
  3. Who Won Round 1 of Hagler-Hearns?
    By clean in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 08-02-2007, 03:43 PM
  4. Was Hearns THIS Much Bigger Than Hagler?
    By Samson3000 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-31-2006, 10:48 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing