Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 80

Thread: Could Hearns have ever beaten Hagler?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    67,034
    Mentioned
    1706 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3144
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Could Hearns have ever beaten Hagler?

    Yes, Hearns had the tools and skills to stay away from Hagler and possibly win on points. He did injure his hand in the fight and his legs were weak as well. So he could do it and he always wanted a return as he felt he could beat Hagler. He did unofficially beat Leonard.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,320
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    822
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Could Hearns have ever beaten Hagler?

    Tommy would NEVER ever beat MMH at middleweight not in a million years , as great as the Hitman was he landed his best punches before he damaged his hand , and Hagler just walked threw them ,both were in there prime at the time,Hagler always would have to much ammo against Tommy ,although Hearns should have got the decision over Sugar ray , they were both past there best by then ,there was only one man who beat Leonard in his prime

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Kent, England
    Posts
    989
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    839
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Could Hearns have ever beaten Hagler?

    Just watched the fight again after reading this thread and WOW! that first round never gets boring

    Hearns had his hands very low a lot of the time and was getting caught by silly shots even at long range. He was constantly on the move but he was never going to be able to keep Hagler off him for the entire fight fighting like that. Hearns was doing well at times landing that long jab maybe if he had have planted his feet and threw 2s,3s, and 4s more often he might have deterred Hagler very slightly or at least been able to slow the pace of the fight down and the tide might have started to turn in his favour the more tired Hagler became with the way he was fighting.

    Hearns dodging some of those blows in the corner 1st round and still trying to fight his way out was pretty special. Hagler was a monster!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    27
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Could Hearns have ever beaten Hagler?

    Tommy beats Marvin in a return match. Hagler was taylor made for Hearns. Slow hands would have killed marvin in a return fight. If they box at all Tommy knocks Marvin down with combinations. The reason Marvin didnt get knocked out in the first fight is that he always had his neck in the "flexed position" waging war. In a return fight Marvin would be forced to box Hearns thus exposing his chin and relaxing his neck resulting in FLASH KNOCKDOWN's. Marvin was very lucky Hearns fought him the way he did in 1985. Hearns biggest problem is he had a bad trainer/manager. Both Hagler and Leonard's trainer out managed Hearns trainer. Had Hearns had Dundee as his trainer he beats everyone. Hearns was the best boxer, had the most FLASH power, and had the best footwoork of all his opponents. Hagler gets sliced up and stopped in a return match IMO
    Hearns and Hagler wasnt a boxing match it was a street fight. Hearns has it all over Hagler from a boxing prospective. Not even close. Yes Marvin was stronger

  5. #5
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Could Hearns have ever beaten Hagler?

    Most times when Hearns landed bombs clean it was like a howitzer shell hitting a tin can vs Haggler it was more like a .45 round hitting a tank. Maybe if Tommy boxes the entire fight and stays away he lasts longer, but Marvin had his number in my opinion.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    27
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Could Hearns have ever beaten Hagler?

    Nobody beats Hagler in a shoot out at 160. Maybe Hearns. Fighting Hearns is like playing with matches next to a fire or trying to defuse a bomb. I can very easily see Hearns putting haglers lights out with one good setup punch. If hagler tried to get inside again Hearns would have held him in the second fight. Once hearns settled hagler down to a boxing match - hagler either gets KO'd, Tko'd by cuts, or out outpointed. a 5 year retired Ray Leonard outpointed hagler. Hearns wins an easy 5 point decision or tko on cuts. Leonard exposed Hagler bigtime. Even Hearns said Leonard would beat Hagler. Tommys weakness was his management not his skills. He was the class of that era with bad management. Can you imagine if Goody and Pat or Dundee trained Hearns. Dont get me wrong I love Hagler but he was tied for 3rd best with Duran in that fab 4. Hearns Leonard 1-2

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2503
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Could Hearns have ever beaten Hagler?

    As much as id like to think Tommy would beat Marvin , its just not a good fight for him , he cant hurt Marvin , so the pressure gets to him sooner or later.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    236
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    749
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Could Hearns have ever beaten Hagler?

    He couldn't keep Leonard off him at 147; he wasn't going to keep Hagler off him at 160.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    174
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    823
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Could Hearns have ever beaten Hagler?

    I don`t know for you guys, but in the first round the only person that is landing clear is Hagler. Every single time that hearns is trowing a shot is on the guard of Marvin. 90% of the time is lile Hagler geting hit above the temple and tommy get hit on the chin. Thats the difference in defensive skills. Emanuel Steward don“t have a fighter with some fundamental denfensive or movement skills. He is like Freddie, he can train only guys with certain talants...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    27
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Could Hearns have ever beaten Hagler?

    Quote Originally Posted by LobowolfXXX View Post
    He couldn't keep Leonard off him at 147; he wasn't going to keep Hagler off him at 160.
    Yeah and in the second fight in 89 Leonard could'nt keep Hearns off of him. Leonard forced Hearns to fight at a catch weight as well. Hagler couldnt knock Leonard down at 160 but Hearns knocked Leonard down twice and out boxed Leonard in both fights. If you don't believe me look at the scorecards from the first fight and ask Leonard himself about the second fight.

    Hagler had his one moment and I give him credit. Smartest thing he ever did was to aviod Hearns after the first fight. Not to say he didnt have a chance of winning a second fight against Hearns. But doubtful. "the sun can't shine on the same dogs ass every day"

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    27
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Could Hearns have ever beaten Hagler?

    Hagler could never replicate that performance. Hearns had more upside in a second fight. Hagler could'nt adjust. If Hagler came with the same hand speed from the Mugabi or Leonard fight then Hearns eats him alive. People judge Hagler off that one fight. As a boxer Hagler would'nt have a chance against Hearns. If he chose to box Hearns- Hagler gets knocked out or stoped on cuts. If he pressured Hearns- Hearns would hold him and not "exchange with Hagler" thus wearing down. Also I'm convinced theres a good chance Hearns hurts Hagler in a second fight. Not from a brawl but from long range. Hagler earned the first fight. But Tommy was the better fighter. Also Hagler was not the same fighter after the Hearns fight. Tommy was still in his prime.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    236
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    749
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Could Hearns have ever beaten Hagler?

    Quote Originally Posted by electivemed View Post
    People judge Hagler off that one fight.
    I thought they judged him on the ten years that he went without losing a fight. Hearns popped Hagler with his best shot, and Hagler's knees buckled; Hagler popped Hearns with his best shot, and the fight was effectively over. Hagler was a great pressure fighter, and he took a better punch than Hearns did. Hearns was an all-time great, but he could be beaten. Leonard showed how to do it, and Hagler did it to perfection.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Hearns/Hagler trash talk.
    By Markusdarkus in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-17-2008, 03:41 PM
  2. Who had best fights Hagler or Hearns
    By nigel2smooth79 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-03-2007, 08:49 AM
  3. Who Won Round 1 of Hagler-Hearns?
    By clean in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 08-02-2007, 03:43 PM
  4. Was Hearns THIS Much Bigger Than Hagler?
    By Samson3000 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-31-2006, 10:48 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing