
Originally Posted by
marbleheadmaui

Originally Posted by
Jimanuel Boogustus
If we aren't taking social standing/ influence into account, then we shouldn't have to account for something as subjective as HOF.
IMO Canastota assuming that Rocky Balboa is a HOF is no different to me assuming that Ken Norton would be lit up by most of the heavyweights of the 90's... Except that in my eyes, I am right and they are dumb as fuck
Otherwise interesting post. Lots to disagree about

The HOF, at this point, remains a reasonable, if imperfect shorthand for greatness.
You do realize Stallone went in in a non-fighting capacity like guys including AJ Liebling, Budd Schulberg. Bert Sugar and Howard Cosell, right?

It's still not solid enough for me. Unfortunately for the sake of this thread, cold hard facts can sometimes be lost on me simply because they are only relevant to their own era's. Which is why IMO, you have to leave room for speculation simply because the ballpark has and always will change.
Ken Norton who went 1-4 against the other major players of his era, is a hall of famer yet Donnavan Ruddock isn't.
Why? Because Ken Norton beat a past prime and somewhat overrated Muhammad Ali.
I do realise Sly was inducted in a non-fighting capacity but I'm allowed artistic licence because i was making a good point with it

Bookmarks