Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 45

Thread: British/Common Wealth titles ? What do they mean ?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,364
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1397
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: British/Common Wealth titles ? What do they mean ?

    I think anything that relates to the commonwealth should be scrapped. That includes the Commonwealth Games. Just a daft outdated relic.

    The British Title is still very prestigious though, but maybe if only for fighters that are never gonna be world beaters?
    Hidden Content
    Original & Best: The Sugar Man

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    12
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: British/Common Wealth titles ? What do they mean ?

    ^^ Sounds like the WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS the americans hold for so many sports (yet are only inclusive of american teams) LOL

    I don't see a problem with it at all, but I do have a problem with so many CHAMPIONS OF THE WORLD etc ... It is clear, this belt is champion of the commonwealth states, the british one reflecting the british isles... Dont see an issue?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    954
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: British/Common Wealth titles ? What do they mean ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus View Post
    I think anything that relates to the commonwealth should be scrapped. That includes the Commonwealth Games. Just a daft outdated relic.

    The British Title is still very prestigious though, but maybe if only for fighters that are never gonna be world beaters?
    the commonwealth belt is a decent belt

    One below the british if you like and very prestigeous

    and the commonwealth games are decent, the one in Manchester a few years back did endless good for the city and the country

    for instance the veladrome (spelling) was built for the games and since a lot of the training for the british bike athletes happens there, and look at how many golds we won in those events in the last olympics
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,364
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1397
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: British/Common Wealth titles ? What do they mean ?

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus View Post
    I think anything that relates to the commonwealth should be scrapped. That includes the Commonwealth Games. Just a daft outdated relic.

    The British Title is still very prestigious though, but maybe if only for fighters that are never gonna be world beaters?
    the commonwealth belt is a decent belt

    One below the british if you like and very prestigeous

    and the commonwealth games are decent, the one in Manchester a few years back did endless good for the city and the country

    for instance the veladrome (spelling) was built for the games and since a lot of the training for the british bike athletes happens there, and look at how many golds we won in those events in the last olympics
    Good point on the CW games, were regeneration is concerned but that has naff all to do with Boxing ay?
    Hidden Content
    Original & Best: The Sugar Man

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    954
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: British/Common Wealth titles ? What do they mean ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus View Post
    I think anything that relates to the commonwealth should be scrapped. That includes the Commonwealth Games. Just a daft outdated relic.

    The British Title is still very prestigious though, but maybe if only for fighters that are never gonna be world beaters?
    the commonwealth belt is a decent belt

    One below the british if you like and very prestigeous

    and the commonwealth games are decent, the one in Manchester a few years back did endless good for the city and the country

    for instance the veladrome (spelling) was built for the games and since a lot of the training for the british bike athletes happens there, and look at how many golds we won in those events in the last olympics
    Good point on the CW games, were regeneration is concerned but that has naff all to do with Boxing ay?

    you said anything to do with the commonwealth should be scrapped
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,364
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1397
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: British/Common Wealth titles ? What do they mean ?

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus View Post
    I think anything that relates to the commonwealth should be scrapped. That includes the Commonwealth Games. Just a daft outdated relic.

    The British Title is still very prestigious though, but maybe if only for fighters that are never gonna be world beaters?
    the commonwealth belt is a decent belt

    One below the british if you like and very prestigeous

    and the commonwealth games are decent, the one in Manchester a few years back did endless good for the city and the country

    for instance the veladrome (spelling) was built for the games and since a lot of the training for the british bike athletes happens there, and look at how many golds we won in those events in the last olympics
    Good point on the CW games, were regeneration is concerned but that has naff all to do with Boxing ay?

    you said anything to do with the commonwealth should be scrapped
    Yeah... Then you made a valid point regarding Regeneration. But that has nothing to do with the Commonwealth belt.
    So what I'm saying is, I retract my comment about The games, simply on the premise it creates jobs & wealth for our nation (tbc).

    Kapeesh?
    Hidden Content
    Original & Best: The Sugar Man

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    954
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: British/Common Wealth titles ? What do they mean ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus View Post
    I think anything that relates to the commonwealth should be scrapped. That includes the Commonwealth Games. Just a daft outdated relic.

    The British Title is still very prestigious though, but maybe if only for fighters that are never gonna be world beaters?
    the commonwealth belt is a decent belt

    One below the british if you like and very prestigeous

    and the commonwealth games are decent, the one in Manchester a few years back did endless good for the city and the country

    for instance the veladrome (spelling) was built for the games and since a lot of the training for the british bike athletes happens there, and look at how many golds we won in those events in the last olympics
    Good point on the CW games, were regeneration is concerned but that has naff all to do with Boxing ay?

    you said anything to do with the commonwealth should be scrapped
    Yeah... Then you made a valid point regarding Regeneration. But that has nothing to do with the Commonwealth belt.
    So what I'm saying is, I retract my comment about The games, simply on the premise it creates jobs & wealth for our nation (tbc).

    Kapeesh?

    i get you now, you need to make this shit clear in the first place

    by the way, the commonwealth belt is a very valid belt

    not only does it give british fighters a clear route to the british title it also gives fighters from poorer african countries who are struggling to live a chance to make some money
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,364
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1397
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: British/Common Wealth titles ? What do they mean ?

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus View Post
    I think anything that relates to the commonwealth should be scrapped. That includes the Commonwealth Games. Just a daft outdated relic.

    The British Title is still very prestigious though, but maybe if only for fighters that are never gonna be world beaters?
    the commonwealth belt is a decent belt

    One below the british if you like and very prestigeous

    and the commonwealth games are decent, the one in Manchester a few years back did endless good for the city and the country

    for instance the veladrome (spelling) was built for the games and since a lot of the training for the british bike athletes happens there, and look at how many golds we won in those events in the last olympics
    Good point on the CW games, were regeneration is concerned but that has naff all to do with Boxing ay?

    you said anything to do with the commonwealth should be scrapped
    Yeah... Then you made a valid point regarding Regeneration. But that has nothing to do with the Commonwealth belt.
    So what I'm saying is, I retract my comment about The games, simply on the premise it creates jobs & wealth for our nation (tbc).

    Kapeesh?

    i get you now, you need to make this shit clear in the first place

    by the way, the commonwealth belt is a very valid belt

    not only does it give british fighters a clear route to the british title it also gives fighters from poorer african countries who are struggling to live a chance to make some money
    Meh... It's not valid. The commonwealth is not valid as it is virtually not existent.
    Hidden Content
    Original & Best: The Sugar Man

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 37
    Last Post: 05-03-2008, 09:39 PM
  2. Is Kelly a common boy's name in the US??
    By leftylee in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 02-19-2008, 12:23 PM
  3. What do Clottey and Williams have in common?
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 01-31-2008, 05:31 PM
  4. What the best fighters have in common ???
    By kyle0930 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-04-2006, 04:44 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing